2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.06.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of Ti/polymer biocomposites for load-bearing implant applications

Abstract: /npsi/ctrl?lang=en http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/ctrl?lang=fr READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/jsp/nparc_cp.jsp?lang=en Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n'arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPubli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ti ASTM F67-00. [16] To obtain porosities between 30 and 50 pct and to ensure the desired stiffness, [4,17,18] the compacting pressures used were 38.5, 89.7, 147.7, and 211.5 MPa (from the compressibility curve of the powder), and the sintered temperatures were 1273 K, 1373 K, 1473 K, and 1573 K (1000°C, 1100°C, 1200°C, and 1300°C) for 2 hours (Table I). The powder mass used to obtain samples with dimensions suitable for testing compression (height/diameter = 0.8) was 5.14 g. The compacting step was carried out using an Instron 5505 universal machine (Instron, Norwood, MA) to apply the pressure needed for the desired porosity.…”
Section: A Samples Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ti ASTM F67-00. [16] To obtain porosities between 30 and 50 pct and to ensure the desired stiffness, [4,17,18] the compacting pressures used were 38.5, 89.7, 147.7, and 211.5 MPa (from the compressibility curve of the powder), and the sintered temperatures were 1273 K, 1373 K, 1473 K, and 1573 K (1000°C, 1100°C, 1200°C, and 1300°C) for 2 hours (Table I). The powder mass used to obtain samples with dimensions suitable for testing compression (height/diameter = 0.8) was 5.14 g. The compacting step was carried out using an Instron 5505 universal machine (Instron, Norwood, MA) to apply the pressure needed for the desired porosity.…”
Section: A Samples Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can create a stress shielding effect at the bone tissue/implant interface and, finally, leads to loosening of the implant. Moreover, the solid structure of the implant shows the lack or low ability to induce implant fixation and bone tissue regeneration 9–11. Thus, there are increasing needs to obtain a new kind of implants materials for solving all of above‐described problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the solid structure of the implant shows the lack or low ability to induce implant fixation and bone tissue regeneration. [9][10][11] Thus, there are increasing needs to obtain a new kind of implants materials for solving all of above-described problems. One of the solutions is to use a porous metallic structure instead of cast material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, conventional implants still undergo problems of biomechanical mismatch of elastic modulus and interfacial stability with host tissues. Efforts have been made to develop low/matching stiffness materials to reduce stress shielding 24–27. Among these new materials, porous titanium (Ti) and Ti‐high‐density polyethylene (Ti‐HDPE) provide sufficient strength and corrosion resistance as well as high biocompatibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts have been made to develop low/matching stiffness materials to reduce stress shielding. [24][25][26][27] Among these new materials, porous titanium (Ti) and Ti-high-density polyethylene (Ti-HDPE) provide sufficient strength and corrosion resistance as well as high biocompatibility. Compared with conventional biomedical Ti-6Al-4V, low modulus alloys are effective to reduce stress shielding, 28 although their optimum modulus, strength, and fatigue resistance remain a big challenge regarding implant durability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%