The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness 2017
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face and (Im)politeness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study bears relevance for broader research on "face" as well. We agree with scholars like Bargiela-Chiappini (2003); Haugh and Hinze (2003); Sifianou (2011) andO'Driscoll (2017) who argued that "face" -and "face"-related expressions in particular -should be studied for its own sake.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Our study bears relevance for broader research on "face" as well. We agree with scholars like Bargiela-Chiappini (2003); Haugh and Hinze (2003); Sifianou (2011) andO'Driscoll (2017) who argued that "face" -and "face"-related expressions in particular -should be studied for its own sake.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Since a speaker and addressee cooperate to maintain each other's face, speech acts that threaten the speaker's face also potentially threaten the addressee's face (Culpeper, 2011;Culpeper and Terkourafi, 2017;O'Driscoll, 2017). Face threatening acts may cause the feelings of embarrassment, shame and/or guilt, whereas acts enhancing face qualities may lead to boosted self-esteem and pride (Sifianou and Tzanne, 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in line with Brown and Levinson's interpretation of "face" arises thanks to the use of this term introduced in the 1980s and 1990s, which at the time was pioneering in the thinking of linguists and pragmatists. In fact, their theory of politeness had a significant impact, and as of the writing of this article, the most commonly used way of understanding the concept of face is still tied to the theoretical framework they developed (O'Driscoll, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%