2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-70353-4_44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face Detection in Thermal Infrared Images: A Comparison of Algorithm- and Machine-Learning-Based Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in [4], learning-based approaches outperform algorithm-based methods in terms of precision and especially robustness. Since we want our system to be usable in real-world conditions, only learning-based methods are an option.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in [4], learning-based approaches outperform algorithm-based methods in terms of precision and especially robustness. Since we want our system to be usable in real-world conditions, only learning-based methods are an option.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we want our system to be usable in real-world conditions, only learning-based methods are an option. For thermal face detection, we trained a HOG-SVM based face detector which, according to [4], gives a good balance between runtime, robustness, precision and implementation complexity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, these benchmark methods failed to detect landmarks correctly when applied to the IR images (Figure 3a and 3b). Previous work on infrared based facial analysis and ROI tracking primarily explored the use of standard machine learning techniques (Wesley, Buddharaju et al 2012, Ghiass, Arandjelović et al 2014, Kopaczka, Acar et al 2016, Kopaczka, Nestler et al 2017. These models allow optimal landmark detection in some cases but need further improvement as they rely on data attributes (features) which in the case of IR facial images lack the details present in visible spectrum images.…”
Section: Facial Landmark Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%