2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-019-1221-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face processing and exploration of social signals in Prader-Willi syndrome: a genetic signature

Abstract: BackgroundFaces are critical social cues that must be perfectly processed in order to engage appropriately in everyday social interactions. In Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS), a rare genetic disorder characterized by cognitive and behavioural difficulties including autism spectrum disorder, the literature referring to face processing is sparse. Given reports of poor social interactions in individuals with PWS, we sought to assess their face and emotion recognition skills during eyetracking recordings.ResultsCompar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our cognitive assessment was only completed by a subset of the larger sample, ndings reveal differential impairment in social cognitive domains, particularly tasks involving processing of faces, implicating cortico-limbic dysfunction (Gur et al, 2017). This pattern of ndings is highly consistent with other recent work in individuals with PWS, involving in-lab assessment (Dykens et al 2019;Debladis et al, 2019). Another recent study offers a translational perspective on psychiatric manifestations of PWS, through the RDoC matrix (Salles et al, 2020): de cits in social processes are highlighted, with eventrelated potential (ERP) evidence that PWS patients have altered processing of faces (Key et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Although our cognitive assessment was only completed by a subset of the larger sample, ndings reveal differential impairment in social cognitive domains, particularly tasks involving processing of faces, implicating cortico-limbic dysfunction (Gur et al, 2017). This pattern of ndings is highly consistent with other recent work in individuals with PWS, involving in-lab assessment (Dykens et al 2019;Debladis et al, 2019). Another recent study offers a translational perspective on psychiatric manifestations of PWS, through the RDoC matrix (Salles et al, 2020): de cits in social processes are highlighted, with eventrelated potential (ERP) evidence that PWS patients have altered processing of faces (Key et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…PWS patients recognized joy in 90% of the cases presented to them but sadness in only 55%, anger in 40%, fear in 37%, surprise in 55%, and disgust in 43% 51 . These patients have an impaired ability to organize visual information into a coherent social story, have more difficulty making appropriate social attributions than do other patients matched for IQ 52 , and show impaired voice detection and face 53 55 . Moreover, PWS patients fare worse than Down’s syndrome patients in behavior with others and are less active in social organization 56 in association with emotional lability 57 , 58 .…”
Section: Rdoc Approach and Pwsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is only natural to assume that their social interaction difficulties are related to deficits in processing the two major sources of information in human communication: the human face and voice [20,21]. Concerning facial information processing, participants with PWS have a known facial recognition deficit related to an altered strategy of face exploration [12]. Belin et al [22] suggested that the human face and voice constitute a fused entity-in which case, face processing deficits should be accompanied by voice processing deficits.…”
Section: Social Interactions and Voice Processing In Pwsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, we were able to collect the data of more than 60 participants with this rare pathology. This large cohort of participants has also allowed us to analyze and compare the genetic subtypes that are differently impaired on face processing [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%