2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.12.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face recognition using locality sensitive histograms of oriented gradients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each m we repeated our face recognition experiments 50 times using the MSR-MSF-VQ algorithm, and calculated the mean of the 50 results. The corresponding experimental graph of our proposed algorithm compared with LSHOG (locality sensitive histograms of oriented gradients) [ 49 ] and HOG [ 10 ] plus different dimension reduction algorithms including PCA [ 1 ], MFA [ 50 ], NPE [ 51 ] and LPP [ 7 ] using the same Yale face database are plotted in Fig 7 . The Y-axis denotes the recognition accuracy and the X-axis shows the number of training samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For each m we repeated our face recognition experiments 50 times using the MSR-MSF-VQ algorithm, and calculated the mean of the 50 results. The corresponding experimental graph of our proposed algorithm compared with LSHOG (locality sensitive histograms of oriented gradients) [ 49 ] and HOG [ 10 ] plus different dimension reduction algorithms including PCA [ 1 ], MFA [ 50 ], NPE [ 51 ] and LPP [ 7 ] using the same Yale face database are plotted in Fig 7 . The Y-axis denotes the recognition accuracy and the X-axis shows the number of training samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Fig 7 also shows that the MSR-MSF-VQ algorithm performs best in most cases with the same training set. This result occurs because—although LSHOG is better than the original HOG (as reported in [ 49 ])—the LSHOG algorithm, which computes a histogram of gradient orientations over the entire face at each pixel location, ignores the interactions between different sub-regions, causing its recognition rate to be below that of the proposed MSR-MSF-VQ algorithm. Therefore, we can conclude that the recognition performance of our proposed algorithm is more robust than that of other methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) is a very popular texture descriptor since Dalal and Triggs presented it in 2005 [ 44 ]. This method has demonstrated a great performance in multiple fields, such as pedestrian detection [ 44 ] or face recognition [ 45 ]. Another very popular descriptor is Local Binary Pattern (LBP) proposed by Ojala et al [ 46 ] due to their simplicity and high capability to extract the intrinsic features from the textures.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, several researchers have achieved significant advances in face recognition system, still this application have many challenges like intra-class variations in illumination, expression, noise, pose and occlusion [4,5]. So, robust and discriminant feature generation have become a problem in face recognition [6]. In addition, the dimensionality of collected human face images is often very high, which leads to high computational complexity and a curse of dimensionality issue [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%