Face-to-Display Working: Decarbonisation Potential of not Commuting to Work before Covid-19 and during and after Lockdowns

Abstract

The main goal of this study was to examine whether full face-to-display working instead of commuting to work is a suitable solution for carbon emission reduction. Data from an international Austrian company were used. The study adopted cross tabulation for analysing the relationships of commuting (carbon emissions) in different periods in relation to face-to-display environmental benefits. The study analysed whether the major benefit of e-working, namely not commuting to work, can reduce carbon emissions. Real evidence of decarbonisation data from an Austrian company was provided. There are significant differences in the numbers of workers in cubicles and at home during the periods. The study reveals that face-to-display work can save CO2 emissions by reducing work-related trips. The data obtained offer a stimulating view of potential carbon emissions savings if employees continue working from home. Additionally, further saving factors correlate with the findings of this study, in particular decreases in energy consumption. Based on the data received, after the easing of the lockdown period, full e-workers mitigated the extent of their carbon footprint by almost 62% because of transport emissions. Moreover, in that period, 126 072 kg of CO2 emission of energy consumption was saved. Generally, the results indicate that an increase of e-workers tends to decrease the footprint from transport emissions and energy consumption. This paper finds that workers working remotely decrease the carbon foot print as a result of zero commuting and energy consumption during different periods of the Covid-19 pandemic. The findings show that more long-term and comprehensive studies are needed, especially in relation to e-workers who have invested in lower-emission home offices. This study has contributed to highlighting the environmental benefit of reducing CO2 emissions of face-to-display workers by not commuting to work. The findings are based on data from an international Austrian company.
 
 Received: 4 February 2021 / Accepted: 24 March 2021 / Published: 10 May 2021

Estimating E-workability Components Across Central European Countries

“…Preliminary results show that e-working increased when it was obligatory under lockdowns (Beno, 2021a). But this was a novelty for most workers, and it was a test of a new workplace culture mediated by technology and Covid-19 pandemics.…”

“…E-working situations rely directly on the industry and the specific job requirements needed to complete the assigned tasks. E-working and the percentage of GDP services have a very [7] strong positive correlation: As the GDP increases, the probability of e-working increases. There is therefore a direct correlation with GDP services.…”

Assessing the Carbon Footprint of Teleworking: A Case Study of Two Research Projects before and after the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Government-imposed restrictions on daily mobility during the COVID-19 pandemic have led to a reduction in individual mobility and an increase in teleworking [11]. Recent studies have focused on examining the impact of teleworking in the post-pandemic era [11,12], the resultant decrease in carbon emissions [13], and the CF associated with teleworking and commuting for work in organizations during [14] and after the pandemic [15]. However, there have been no studies conducted on the role of teleworking during scientific projects.…”

Exploring the Health Impacts and Inequalities of the New Way of Working

“…Home working may also improve work-life balance and the productivity of work, while also offering protection from exposure to communicable diseases 5,13 . On a societal level, home working may provide an attractive opportunity to contribute to protecting the climate through reducing carbon emissions generated by the commute 14–16 …”

“…5,13 On a societal level, home working may provide an attractive opportunity to contribute to protecting the climate through reducing carbon emissions generated by the commute. [14][15][16] However, the pandemic has also shed light on some of the potential negative outcomes of a more permanent adoption of work from home policies. The burden on mental health has been well documented throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.…”