1976
DOI: 10.2307/2094729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face-to-Face: The Alienating Effects of Class, Status and Power Divisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One general formulation of the professional-client interaction process adopts a conflicting subcultures framework and explains the clients' lack of success in obtaining information by referring to the clinicians' differing interests and greater power [5]. Others have argued that clinicians withhold information 'to maintain patterns of dominance and subordination' [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One general formulation of the professional-client interaction process adopts a conflicting subcultures framework and explains the clients' lack of success in obtaining information by referring to the clinicians' differing interests and greater power [5]. Others have argued that clinicians withhold information 'to maintain patterns of dominance and subordination' [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remainder of this paper outlines a number of propositions which suggest some of the ways in which aligning actions are socially distributed according to peoples' relative interpersonal power, especially their ability to use interpersonal threats (Archibald, 1976). Where appropriate, gender and age will be used as exemplar statuses to indicate more specifically how interpersonal power influences the use of aligning actions.…”
Section: Social Distribution Of Aligning Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly this is not a situation which is understood by a simple question of satisfaction but is more complex. In addition, it is not clear to what extent the issue of false consciousness might impact the situation, although issues of authority relations, relative deprivation, ruling ideology, and perceived alternatives to the situation influence the level of involvement (Runciman, 1966;Parkins, 1971; Archibald, 1976).…”
Section: Alienation As a Social Processmentioning
confidence: 99%