2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-009-9224-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face validity in personality tests: psychometric instruments and projective techniques in comparison

Abstract: Psychological testing, Personality tests, Psychometric instruments, Projective techniques, Face validity, Measurement,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Data were collected from January to May 2018. Two validated questionnaires were used, according to the nomothetic and quantitative approach (Sartori, ): the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES; Schaufeli, Bakker, & Salanova, ) and the Work Ability Index (WAI; Tuomi, Ilmarinen, Jahkola, Katajarinne, & Tulkki, ). Job satisfaction was assessed by a single item (‘I'm satisfied with my job’) using a Likert rating scale from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum; Dolbier, Webster, McCalister, Mallon, & Steinhardt, ).…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were collected from January to May 2018. Two validated questionnaires were used, according to the nomothetic and quantitative approach (Sartori, ): the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES; Schaufeli, Bakker, & Salanova, ) and the Work Ability Index (WAI; Tuomi, Ilmarinen, Jahkola, Katajarinne, & Tulkki, ). Job satisfaction was assessed by a single item (‘I'm satisfied with my job’) using a Likert rating scale from 1 (minimum) to 7 (maximum; Dolbier, Webster, McCalister, Mallon, & Steinhardt, ).…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, items were developed to measure both positive play beliefs and behaviors. This procedure enabled us to generate questionnaire items with both high content and face validity based on input from experts and players (see Sartori, 2010 ). In Study 2, the aim was to examine the psychometric properties of the PPS items and to pursue scale formation via principal components analysis (PCA).…”
Section: Overview Of the Current Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the idea that performance-based tests are akin to a “psychological X-ray” that will uncover hidden truths despite the patient's best efforts to conceal them has not held up to empirical scrutiny (Meyer et al, 2011; Weiner, 2004), it is nonetheless true that performance-based test responses are more spontaneous—less tightly controlled—than are responses to self-report tests. Research confirms that it is more difficult for respondents to dissimulate on performance-based tests than self-report tests (Ganellen, 2008; Hartmann & Hartmann, 2014; Sartori, 2010). 2 …”
Section: Diagnosis Assessment and Multi-methods Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 91%