1984
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(198403)40:2<499::aid-jclp2270400219>3.0.co;2-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face validity vs. item subtlety in the MMPI D scale

Abstract: The distinction between item subtlety and face validity (Holden & Jackson, 1979) provided the basis to reevaluate findings for subtle items in the MMPI D scale (N = 214). Results indicated that the inclusion of nonpathological items in the D scale did not lead to greater predictive validity of depression criteria. The need for substantive considerations in scale construction was emphasized further.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obvious scales are most susceptible to deliberate distortion and the subtle scales the least. With regard to the subtle scales, even though they may appear to resist the influence of response sets, their utility should be questioned because of their very weak criterion validity demonstrated in earlier studies (Burgess, Campbell, & Zylberberg, 1984;Burkhart, Gynther, & Fromuth, 1980;Gynther, Burkhart, & Hovanitz, 1979;Hovanitz & Gynther, 1980;Hovanitz, Gynther, & Marks, 1983;Wilson, 1980). Without criterion validity (i.e., they do not predict criterion behavior), the interpretation of subtle scores is problematic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obvious scales are most susceptible to deliberate distortion and the subtle scales the least. With regard to the subtle scales, even though they may appear to resist the influence of response sets, their utility should be questioned because of their very weak criterion validity demonstrated in earlier studies (Burgess, Campbell, & Zylberberg, 1984;Burkhart, Gynther, & Fromuth, 1980;Gynther, Burkhart, & Hovanitz, 1979;Hovanitz & Gynther, 1980;Hovanitz, Gynther, & Marks, 1983;Wilson, 1980). Without criterion validity (i.e., they do not predict criterion behavior), the interpretation of subtle scores is problematic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a number of attempts to divide the items into subsets on the basis of face validity. Items that are more obvious indicators have been shown to be more highly correlated with a variety of criterion measures than the more subtle items (Burgess, Campbell, & Zylerberg, 1984; Burkhart, Gynther, & Fromuth, 1980). The OBD Scale (Weiner, 1948) was chosen as the face-valid MMPI Depression scale for this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 The 40-item Obvious Depression subscale (OBD) is a more 19 and to correlate more highly with other depression criteria. 20 It was therefore chosen as the measure for the present study to increase the relevance of the ®ndings for nonpsychiatric populations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%