Facebook and the creation of the metaverse: radical business model innovation or incremental transformation?

Abstract

Purpose In a move characterized by ambiguity, Facebook changed its name to Meta in October 2021, announcing a new era of social interaction, enabled by the metaverse technology that appears poised to become the future center of gravity for online social interactions. At first glance, the communicated change signals a radically new business model (BM) based on an unprecedented configuration of the three following components: value creation, value proposition and value capture. The purpose of this paper is to analyze Facebook’s announced changes in its BM to clarify whether the change is as radical as communicated or rather represents an incremental transformation of the current BM.Design/methodology/approach This investigation adopted an in-depth case study research method. The process included using a structured approach to collect 153 data points, including academic studies and publicly available information, followed by qualitative content analysis.Findings The results of our analysis of Facebook’s entrepreneurial journey indicate that the communicated strategic refocusing does not correspond to a radical BM innovation pattern. Even though Facebook’s BM might evolve into the innovation phase, as the current changes appear very futuristic, the authors estimate that the core elements of the BM will change incrementally. The investigation indicates that the underlying logic of the straightforward communicative efforts primarily serves two purposes: to improve the external perception of the company and to disseminate an internal change signal within the organization.Originality/value This paper is the first study that takes an entrepreneurship and BM perspective in analyzing Facebook’s approach in rebranding to Meta and refocusing its strategy on building the metaverse. The academic and practical relevance, as well as the potential future impact on business and society, makes the investigation of this case an intriguing prospect. Additionally, the study illuminates the difference between the communicated vision and the real impact on the business, suggesting critical questions about future large-scale rebranding efforts and their effects.

The Metaverse as a Virtual Form of Smart Cities: Opportunities and Challenges for Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability in Urban Futures

“…In recognizing this trend, we also appreciate that the full actualization of the Metaverse concept will require concerted efforts and collaborations between different big tech companies [44], since the project is complex, expensive, and still new in its frontiers. In late 2021, Facebook announced additional global partners from industry, governments, non-profit organizations, academic institutions, and civil rights groups, to collaboratively build the Metaverse [45]. These include Colorintech (UK), Alte Nationalgalerie (Germany), and the Peres Center for Peace and Innovation (Israel), in addition to other institutions across the globe, such as: Seoul National University; the University of Hong Kong; the Centre for Technology, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence and the Law (TRAIL) at the National University of Singapore; and Howard University, to facilitate independent external research.…”

Blockchain for the Metaverse: A Review

“…3. Everyone, from scientists to the general public, will benefit from data exchange in the metaverse [59]. The data collected from AR/VR and IoT devices in the metaverse will be used to create personalized systems that are customized to the users' actions.…”

Some Very Simple Economics of Web3 and the Metaverse

“…Locations are unique and have (x,y) coordinates. For example, JPMorgan recently purchased a parcel and opened a banking lounge, 5 while a real estate developer recently paid $912,228 for 259 parcels to build a virtual shopping mall called "Metajuku" modeled on Tokyo's famous "Harajuku" district to rent shops out to retailers. 6 Indeed, first analyses find that the real estate economy on Decentraland features behavior known from real estate in the physical world [13], is not merely driven by cryptocurrency markets [14], although the pricing of digital land does not yet seem to be efficient [15].…”