Facebook Fuzed

Graham, Wayne

doi:10.1007/978-1-4302-4171-3_14

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…From the Facebook page of Franklin Graham, May 15, 2015, 8:01 p.m.:What are the principles and beliefs that you would not compromise under any circumstances? Even if it meant putting your life on the line?…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Walking and Talking With the Lord: Teleological Curation, Salvation, and the Billy Graham Library

Crane

Davis

2017

Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article offers a critical auto-ethnography of Charlotte’s extensive Billy Graham Library complex, sculpted grounds, and memorial garden. Opened in 2007 and designed as an “ongoing Crusade,” the Billy Graham Library is a notable Evangelical archive. All historical sites are wellsprings curated to convey and preserve a compelling narrative through line that encompasses the meaning of the assembled artifacts on display. The museum is also constructed to win souls to God and bring all visitors to a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, and, we suggest, to usher visitors to an irredentist vision of Christ’s kingdom.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Walking and Talking With the Lord: Teleological Curation, Salvation, and the Billy Graham Library

Crane

Davis

2017

Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…“Pray that everyone will stop the finger-pointing and realize that both parties bear responsibility for the problems we face today.” Franklin Graham, January 7, 2021, in a statement after the January 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. (Graham, 2021)“I don’t want to hear anything about how radical some of you believe republicans (sic) to be when there are lunatics running around New York City setting Fox News Christmas tree on fire.” (Skolnik, 2021)…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Who is To Blame? Partisans’ Use of Blame Spreading in Reaction to Unfair or Dishonest Behavior

Meli

2023

American Politics Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Blame attribution research suggests partisans acknowledge evidence that portrays copartisans negatively but blame externalities for negative events. This study identifies another blame attribution pattern. When people observe unfair/dishonest behavior by a copartisan, instead of shifting blame entirely to others, they engage in blame-spreading. I conduct two tests: a survey of undergraduate students who watched part of a 2020 Presidential debate and a survey experiment of a random sample of adults that randomizes the party affiliation of the debate participant engaging in unfair/dishonest behavior. When the unfair actor is a copartisan, people blame both participants equally. When the unfair actor is in the out-party, people blame the out-party actor. These findings suggest individuals acknowledge undesirable behavior among copartisans, but seek to justify it by identifying blame-worthy behavior by others, thus providing an additional mechanism in motivated reasoning whereby individuals acknowledge events while finding a way to justify such behavior.

show abstract

Facebook Fuzed

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Walking and Talking With the Lord: Teleological Curation, Salvation, and the Billy Graham Library

Walking and Talking With the Lord: Teleological Curation, Salvation, and the Billy Graham Library

Who is To Blame? Partisans’ Use of Blame Spreading in Reaction to Unfair or Dishonest Behavior

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About