Facebook groups as citizen science tools for plant species monitoring

Abstract

1. Social networks offer communication channels through which people share huge amounts of primary data that can be used for scientific analyses, including biodiversity research. To understand to what extent data extracted from social networks could complement data collected for scientific purposes, it is necessary to quantify the bias of such data.2. We analysed which plant traits increased the probability of a wild-growing plant species to be photographed and posted to a social network based on the data from an unstructured citizen science tool; a Facebook group focused on the vascular flora of Sicily (Italy). Then, we compared botanical data collected by this Facebook group members with data collected by scientists in 6,366 vegetation plots sampled across Sicily, stored in the EVA database.3. Our results suggested that data proceeding from the analysed Facebook group were affected by various sampling biases, which differed from the biases inherent to other types of biodiversity data such as those from vegetation plots. 4. Facebook users recorded a higher proportion of red-listed and alien species than vegetation scientists. Therefore, social networks can provide a valuable complement to the data collected by scientists for research purposes. 5. Synthesis and applications. Despite Facebook does not support geotagging and interface for data access and analysis, it is an invaluable source of biodiversity data that could complement those collected by professional researchers. The main advantage of data from social networks is their high dynamism, as they report large amounts of species occurrences in almost real time. Therefore, citizen science data from a Facebook group where the records are curated by expert volunteers can be used (a) for monitoring population dynamics of threatened and alien species; (b) as | 2019

“What’s This Bug?” Questions from the Public Provide Relevant Information on Species Distribution and Human–Insect Interactions

“…Citizen science has gained in popularity and recognition over recent years [2,14]. Traditionally, citizen science data have been collected through structured programs, but researchers are now using various sources such as social media [15].…”

The use of photos to investigate ecological change

“…and that are now stored in old photo books or boxes in people's private archives. Until recently, it was virtually impossible to access these pictures, but Internet‐based platforms and social media now allow crowdsourcing these valuable sources of information (Marcenò et al, 2021; See et al, 2016). For instance, one could think of a web‐based platform, advertised via social media and in the field via fixed ‘poles’ (e.g.…”

“…Since cameras are omnipresent in our society, predominantly those of smartphones, citizens can easily gather image data with a minimum of guidance (e.g. Hampton et al, 2013; Marcenò et al, 2021). With the development of smartphone apps for ecology (Rudic et al, 2020), citizen‐science projects that combine this technology with expert knowledge are now characterizing as many species possible during one or multiple day ‘Bioblitzes’ (Nicolai et al, 2020).…”

Social media as an opportunity or a blind alley in social communication and forest education? – Experiences from Poland

“…Examples of such activities are an inventory of the praying mantis (Mantis religiosa) (Zielinski et al 2018) or the squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) (Kostrzewa and Krauze-Gryz 2019). This type of research is increasingly being carried out in other parts of the world (Pace et al 2019, Marcenò et al 2021a, Marcenò et al 2021b), therefore, foresters and scientists could create local groups, the scientific potential of which could be used in the future in the monitoring of invasive species (Daume and Galaz 2016) and rare species (Gonella et al 2015, Azzurro and Tiralongo 2020, Al Mabruk et al 2021) and in various tasks for nature conservation, e.g. field assistance in the removal of invasive species.…”