2021
DOI: 10.1002/cav.2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FaceCaps for facial expression recognition

Abstract: Facial expression recognition (FER) is a significant research task in the computer vision field. In this paper, we present a novel network FaceCaps for facial expression recognition with the following novel characteristics: an embedding structure based on a Capsule network which encodes relative spatial relationships between features; incorporates the feature polymerization property of FaceNet, thus offering a more efficient approach to discriminate complex facial expressions; a target reconstruction loss as a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang and Zhang proposed CNN with a multidimensional sequence occlusion face feature extraction module and used the deep learning method to improve the recognition rate [28]. Wu et al proposed a novel face recognition network, FaceCaps to provide an efficient method for complex face expression recognition [29]. Zhong et al proposed a face-part attention mechanism-based method to extract features of the whole face image [30].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wang and Zhang proposed CNN with a multidimensional sequence occlusion face feature extraction module and used the deep learning method to improve the recognition rate [28]. Wu et al proposed a novel face recognition network, FaceCaps to provide an efficient method for complex face expression recognition [29]. Zhong et al proposed a face-part attention mechanism-based method to extract features of the whole face image [30].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In face recognition experiments, the commonly used face recognition occlusion datasets FDDB, COFW, and MAFA were selected to complete the test. FaceCaps [29], FPA-FER [30], and DNN-FER [31] were selected for comparison. Simulations were performed on the face detection dataset and benchmark (FDDB), Caltech occluded faces in the wild (COFW), and multiscale attention feature aggregation (MAFA) datasets, respectively, and each group of simulations is carried out for 100 times.…”
Section: Face Recognition Of University Information Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of facial expressions is important to artificial intelligence and has enormous promise in psychological research, driver fatigue monitoring, interactive game creation, virtual reality [ 45 ], intelligent education [ 46 ], and medical fields [ 47 ]. After recognizing facial expressions, Wu comprehended the emotional content of images and generated image captions using the Face-Cap model [ 48 ]; Cha used surface electromyography (sEMG) around the eyes [ 49 ] (sEMG reference) to react to the user’s facial expressions [ 50 ], thereby performing expression recognition.…”
Section: Biometric Recognition Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IACNN [60] 50.98 DLP-CNN [43] 51.05 Island Loss [8] 52.52 TDTLN [61] 53.10 RAN [48] 54.19 LDL-ALSG [56] 56.50 ViT + SE [62] 54.29 FaceCaps [63] 58.50 In addition, the number of attention heads obviously affects the performance of our model. Figure 5 shows the accuracy results with a changing number of attention heads on the RAF-DB dataset.…”
Section: Accuracy (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%