2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7tc01523b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facet-engineered CeO2/graphene composites for enhanced NO2gas-sensing

Abstract: An effective approach to enhance the gas sensing performance of CeO2/graphene composites at room temperature is demonstrated and discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The response and recovery times of the sensor are respectively dened as the times taken to reach 90% of its stable resistance value on exposure to target vapour and to reach 10% of its baseline resistance value when exposed to an air atmosphere. [47][48][49] The pure WO 3 sensor shows a response time of 165 s and recovery time of 132 s, which are shown for comparison in Fig S6(e). † However, the response and recovery times of the prepared sensor are 18 s and 24 s respectively.…”
Section: Gas Sensing Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response and recovery times of the sensor are respectively dened as the times taken to reach 90% of its stable resistance value on exposure to target vapour and to reach 10% of its baseline resistance value when exposed to an air atmosphere. [47][48][49] The pure WO 3 sensor shows a response time of 165 s and recovery time of 132 s, which are shown for comparison in Fig S6(e). † However, the response and recovery times of the prepared sensor are 18 s and 24 s respectively.…”
Section: Gas Sensing Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Scherer's equation, the average sizes of CeO 2 nanoparticles in the composites are calculated to be about 20, 19, 16, 13, and 4 nm for samples (a) to (e), respectively. Figure S4 displays the Raman spectra of graphene, 22 CeO 2 , and CeO 2 /graphene composites, the evident D and G bands confirm the presence of graphene. 29,30 The G-band is attributed to the first-order scattering of the E 2g mode, 31 while the D-band is associated with the structural defects or functional groups adsorbed on the carbon basal plane.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64 Based on DFT calculations, the work function of CeO 2 (6.14 eV) is much larger than that of graphene (4.54 eV), large Schottky barrier height exists between graphene and CeO 2 , making it difficult for the electrons to transfer between them, and the system exhibits poor gas sensing performance (Figure S18b-c). 22 Since the electronegativity of Ce 3+ ions is lower, the introduction of Ce 3+ ions in CeO 2 will lower the work function and thus the difference of work function between CeO 2 {111} facets and graphene decreases. Hence, the Schottky barrier height (SBH) is lower.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The oxygen vacancies can significantly enhance the adsorption of oxygen molecules and electrons will transfer from the oxygen vacancies from CeO 2 to the oxygen molecules, resulting in more oxygen species (especially O 2À ). These oxygen species will react with NO 2 , resulting in an abrupt change in the conductivity of the sensor [71]. The graphene sheets by their good properties as: high surface area 2630 m 2 /g, thermal conductivity in the range of 3000-5000 W/mK at room temperature carrier mobility up to 200,000 cm 2 /Vs [72], electrical conductivity of 7200 S/m [73], coming from their structure two-dimensional (2D) single atom layer is used in gas sensing and in the composite leads to increase of the electrical conductivity of CeO 2 and thus improve the performance to gas sensing room temperature [71].…”
Section: The No 2 Gas Sensing Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%