“…The period of 44 -57 years of age, obtained an accuracy of 0.90 and a low Recall, thus indicating that such a period is not adequately detected by the mathematical model, being the period that lower Recall has, on the other hand, the period of 15 -23 years of age, has a good accuracy of 0.95 and a Recall of 0.95 thus indicating that the algorithm detects it well. There are multiple research articles, which have performed facial image analyses such as [18], [19], [20], [21] and [2] in these works as well as in many others the images are analyzed, with different methods such as CNN, ordinal method of deep learning, directional age patterns, Kullback-Leibler divergence and antagonistic generative networks; all these methods show very good results, as well as the one obtained in between work; in the reference [4] they obtain an average success rate of approximately 88%, with a CNN model, as well as in the reference [22], where using a machine learning structure they manage to reduce by up to 37.75% the error finally estimated in [23] use large amounts of data to achieve results superior to those shown in this work. the results of our research show that we are on the right track since we have obtained an efficiency in the classification greater than 97.86%, and an efficiency in predictions approximately 87.64%, these values indicate that we are within an acceptable range of efficiency in the classification, however, it is necessary to improve even more, therefore, this work will continue to be developed to obtain greater efficiency in predictions.…”