1970
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(70)90331-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facial bone fractures associated with cervical spine injuries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,4 Those suffering high velocity injuries such as road traffic accidents (RTAs) are presumed to be at higher risk for cervical spine trauma than those sustaining lower velocity injuries as seen in falls and workplace accidents. [5][6][7][8] The majority of cohort studies have reported wide variations in the incidence of CSI in maxillofacial trauma patients, ranging between 0% and 8%, in part owing to differences in the mechanism of injury, anatomical location of impact, location of trauma centre, and patient demographics including age and sex. [1][2][3][4][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] In specific subgroups of patients such as RTA fatalities, the incidence of CSI has been cited as high as 24%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Those suffering high velocity injuries such as road traffic accidents (RTAs) are presumed to be at higher risk for cervical spine trauma than those sustaining lower velocity injuries as seen in falls and workplace accidents. [5][6][7][8] The majority of cohort studies have reported wide variations in the incidence of CSI in maxillofacial trauma patients, ranging between 0% and 8%, in part owing to differences in the mechanism of injury, anatomical location of impact, location of trauma centre, and patient demographics including age and sex. [1][2][3][4][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] In specific subgroups of patients such as RTA fatalities, the incidence of CSI has been cited as high as 24%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Those suffering high-velocity injuries, such as motor vehicle accidents, are presumed to be at higher risk for cervical spine trauma versus lower velocity injuries as seen in falls and workplace accidents. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Nevertheless, there is a paucity of corroborating evidence to support the relationship between craniomaxillofacial fractures and spinal injury.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Those suffering high velocity injuries such as road traffic accidents (RTAs) are presumed to be at higher risk for cervical spine trauma than those sustaining lower velocity injuries as seen in falls and workplace accidents. [5][6][7][8] The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and patterns of CSI associated with maxillofacial fractures admitted at a Indian tertiary referral trauma centre.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%