Facial emotion recognition ability in psychiatrists, psychologist and psychological counselors

Dalkıran, Mihriban

doi:10.26226/morressier.5971be88d462b80290b53513

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, contrary to a previous study and using the same task (Bani et al, 2021 ) there was no difference in emotion recognition for fear and sadness, only for happiness and anger. Clinicians may be more skilled at recognizing facial emotions than lay people, as suggested by previous studies (Dalkiran et al, 2017 ), and this ability mitigates the disruptive effect of facemasks for some emotions, in particular for unpleasant emotions such as sadness and fear. However, a comparison with a paired group of nonclinicians should be used to confirm this hypothesis.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 77%

“…Recently, a study focused on the non‐verbal synchrony of facial expressions showed that absolute synchrony (defined as an emotional interaction within 2 s) was positively related to the therapeutic alliance (Yokotani et al, 2020 ) and required a deep ability to read facial expressions. In a facial emotion recognition task, clinical psychologists performed better than psychopharmacologists (Dalkiran et al, 2017 ), suggesting that working more on relational aspects contributed to improving the ability to recognize emotions in facial expressions. In a cross‐cultural study (Hutchison et al, 2018 ), US and Japanese clinical psychology trainees were assessed in their ability to recognize facially expressed emotions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Impact of facemasks on psychotherapy: Clinician's confidence and emotion recognition

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives Facial emotion recognition is a key component of human interactions, and in clinical relationships contributes to building and maintaining the therapeutic alliance with patients. The introduction of facemasks has reduced the availability of facial information in private and professional relationships. This study aimed to assess the impact of facemasks on clinicians' perception of clinical interactions as well as their ability to read facial expressions. Methods In this cross‐sectional study, a purposive sample of 342 clinical psychologists or psychotherapists completed an online survey including the assessment of burnout, alexithymia, emotion dysregulation, and self‐perceived ability to build effective relationships and communication with patients with/without facemasks. Participants were randomly assigned to the standardized facial emotion recognition task Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy FACES 2‐Adult Faces including 24 faces representing anger, fear, sadness, and happiness. Results Facemasks impaired the self‐perceived ability of clinicians to build effective relationships and communicate with patients and reduced satisfaction in clinical encounters. The ability of clinicians to recognize facial emotions is significantly reduced for masked happy and angry faces, but not for sad and afraid ones. The perceived difficulty in building good relationships and communication with patients had a positive correlation with alexithymia and emotion dysregulation; higher levels of discomfort when wearing facemasks had a positive correlation with burnout and emotion dysregulation. Conclusion Facemasks reduced clinicians' self‐confidence in clinical encounters with patients wearing facemasks, but their facial emotion recognition performance was only partially impaired.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 77%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of facemasks on psychotherapy: Clinician's confidence and emotion recognition

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Then comes the question: is the mental health of the ATYIs affected by environmental factors? The answer is affirmative (Dalkiran, 2017). Earlier studies have revealed the impact of environmental factors on some social behaviors (Zhang, 2010).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Determination and Correlation Analysis of Mental Health Influencing Factors Among Ant Tribe Young Intellectuals Based on Cognitive Neuroscience

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper aims to identify the main influencing factors of the mental health of ant tribe young intellectuals (ATYIs) and ascertain those factors in favor of mental health. Based on the research findings in cognitive neuroscience, the author explored the main factors affecting the mental health of the ATYIs through a questionnaire survey on 904 youngsters graduated in the past five years. The questionnaire evaluates the overall mental health of the respondents with four psychological test scales, namely Positive PsyCap Questionnaire (PPQ), Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90), Adult Dispositional Hope Scale (ADHS), and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Through the analysis, it is concluded that family income, academic performance, and interpersonal relationship are the main influencing factors of the mental health among the ATYIs. The research finding provides a reference for mental health education in colleges and points the direction for the ATYIs to improve their mental health.

show abstract

Facial emotion recognition ability in psychiatrists, psychologist and psychological counselors

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Impact of facemasks on psychotherapy: Clinician's confidence and emotion recognition

Impact of facemasks on psychotherapy: Clinician's confidence and emotion recognition

Determination and Correlation Analysis of Mental Health Influencing Factors Among Ant Tribe Young Intellectuals Based on Cognitive Neuroscience

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About