2021 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icip42928.2021.9506444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facial Expressions as a Vulnerability in Face Recognition

Abstract: This work explores facial expression bias as a security vulnerability of face recognition systems. Despite the great performance achieved by state-of-the-art face recognition systems, the algorithms are still sensitive to a large range of covariates. We present a comprehensive analysis of how facial expression bias impacts the performance of face recognition technologies. Our study analyzes: i) facial expression biases in the most popular face recognition databases; and ii) the impact of facial expression in f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 and Figure 7 illustrate the results of recently reported face detection models with our designed method. We compare our method against 8 recent deep learning approaches: LDCF+ [27], multitask cascade-CNN [6], ScaleFace [28], CMS-RCNN [8], MSCNN [29], HR [19], Zhu [30], and FAN [29]. We discover that our proposed method performs compelling performance with the SOTA methods on easy set (96.3%) and medium difficulty set (95.1%), respectively.…”
Section: Results On Widermentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Table 4 and Figure 7 illustrate the results of recently reported face detection models with our designed method. We compare our method against 8 recent deep learning approaches: LDCF+ [27], multitask cascade-CNN [6], ScaleFace [28], CMS-RCNN [8], MSCNN [29], HR [19], Zhu [30], and FAN [29]. We discover that our proposed method performs compelling performance with the SOTA methods on easy set (96.3%) and medium difficulty set (95.1%), respectively.…”
Section: Results On Widermentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The ResNet50 model was originally proposed for general image recognition tasks and later it was retrained with the VGGFace2 database [49] for face recognition. This architecture has been extensively used as a starting point in the Facial expressions analysis [57][58][59] and Action Units recognition in competitions like Affective Behavior Analysis in-thewild (ABAW) in FG 2020 [60], ICCV 2021 [61], and CVPR 2022 [62]. The architecture is used as feature extractor by removing the final decision layer.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Need for robustness: Face recognition systems need to become more robust against partial occlusions (from accessories or hair) [72], [42], facial expressions (beyond neutral and smiling faces) [50], and temporary attributes that might change the daily appearance of a face [64], [71]. This can greatly enhance the applicability in more real-life scenarios.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biases can be identified as learning weakness to be exploited by users with malicious intentions (i.e. vulnerability attacks [50]). To be precise, we analyse the differential outcome as defined by Howard et al [33] of two popular face recognition models (FaceNet [55] and ArcFace [17]) with regard to 47 attributes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%