2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facial soft tissue depths in French adults: Variability, specificity and estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
13

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
55
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Sfroza et al [28] provided sexand age-related soft tissue dimensions of orbital region in a Sudanese population to be used for forensic purposes like evaluations of traumas, craniofacial alterations, facial reconstructions, ageing of living and dead people. Guyomarch et al [29] investigated variability in facial soft tissue depths of French adults collected from 37 landmarks on 500 CT (computed tomography) scans and found negligible variations with sex, though corpulence was found significantly correlated with FSTT. Statistically significant differences have been reported in facial tissue depths of different races.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sfroza et al [28] provided sexand age-related soft tissue dimensions of orbital region in a Sudanese population to be used for forensic purposes like evaluations of traumas, craniofacial alterations, facial reconstructions, ageing of living and dead people. Guyomarch et al [29] investigated variability in facial soft tissue depths of French adults collected from 37 landmarks on 500 CT (computed tomography) scans and found negligible variations with sex, though corpulence was found significantly correlated with FSTT. Statistically significant differences have been reported in facial tissue depths of different races.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the statistically significant differences are less in number. However, in other studies, no significant bilateral differences have been found [15,16,24,32].…”
Section: Bilateral Differencesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It has been established that gender has a significant effect on the facial STTs at glabella [10,30], nasal region [10,15,19,22,31], lower part of the nose area [2], mouth [2,5,13,22,31], chin [5,13], orbital region [13,15,31], cheek region [13,19] as well as at the landmarks on the mandible [10,13,19,22,30] and maxilla [10,15,19,30].…”
Section: Sex Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations