2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facial surface electromyography: A systematic review on the state of the art and current perspectives

Leonardo Franz,
Cosimo de Filippis,
Antonio Daloiso
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interpretation of data provided by such diagnostic tools may rely on either qualitative or quantitative evaluation of the output signal in response to either direct electric stimulation (as for nerve excitability testing and electroneurography) or a volitional movement (as for EMG) [24]. Compared to other methods, EMG techniques allow an evaluation of the motor unit action potentials either directly from the muscle itself (in the case of needle EMG) or from the skin surface (in the case of sEMG) [17]. The potential advantages of the sEMG approach include its ease of use and the absence of invasiveness, which may make this technique a possible complement to clinical assessment in the follow-up of patients undergoing neuro-otological surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interpretation of data provided by such diagnostic tools may rely on either qualitative or quantitative evaluation of the output signal in response to either direct electric stimulation (as for nerve excitability testing and electroneurography) or a volitional movement (as for EMG) [24]. Compared to other methods, EMG techniques allow an evaluation of the motor unit action potentials either directly from the muscle itself (in the case of needle EMG) or from the skin surface (in the case of sEMG) [17]. The potential advantages of the sEMG approach include its ease of use and the absence of invasiveness, which may make this technique a possible complement to clinical assessment in the follow-up of patients undergoing neuro-otological surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, they are difficult to use in a routine office setting. Although only a few reports are available [15,16], the assessment of facial function by surface electromyography (sEMG) represents a promising non-invasive solution to achieve objective follow-up data due to the absence of discomfort and the possibility of performing the examination in an outpatient clinic [17]. Nevertheless, data on the use of sEMG in the follow-up of iatrogenic lesions of the facial nerve secondary to skull-base surgery are still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%