“…of the Neuquén Basin (Barros et al, 2016). Much progress has been made during the last decades, but despite the exponential increase in last few years in the number of publications dealing with fluvial fans systems (see review in Ventra & Clarke, 2018, and references therein), our current understanding of fluvial fan stratigraphy is limited to the recognition of general lateral and vertical trends that result from long-term fan progradation, in which dominantly fine-grained overbank deposits with minor volumes of isolated, coarser channel fills are progressively followed upwards in the stratigraphy by the coarser, possibly larger, and increasingly amalgamated channel bodies, with lesser volumes of preserved mud-prone overbank strata (see stratigraphic model in Weissmann et al, 2013, but also Singh, Parkash, & Gohain, 1993Willis, 1993;Nakayama & Ulak, 1999;Shukla et al, 2001;Uba, Heubeck, & Hulka, 2005;Nichols & Fisher, 2007;Wilson, Flint, Payenberg, Tohver, & Lanci, 2014;Owen, Nichols, Hartley, & Weissmann, 2017;Ventra & Clarke, 2018), and the corresponding paleosol moisture variability (Bhattacharyya et al, 2011;Hartley et al, 2013;Trendell, Atchley, & Nordt, 2013). While these achievements considerably increase our ability to predict fluvial stratigraphy and thus reservoir properties, further stratigraphic complexities have been highlighted by some ancient studies, such as inconsistencies in across-basin vertical trends or in the lateral channel body variability (Chesley & Leier, 2018), fining-up rather than coarsening-up vertical trends (Kukulski et al, 2013), or simply weak trends and lateral variability (Rittersbacher, Howell, & Buckley, 2014).…”