1960
DOI: 10.1086/626674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facies Interpretations in Mississippi Delta Borings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1963
1963
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…KOLB and VAN LOPIK (1958) did not note this contact in their description of cores taken by the U. S. Army Engineers for the Mississippi River-Gulf outlet channel. LANKFORD and SHEPARD (1960), however, did note a faunal change to a marsh fauna, thus corroborating the conclusion of a subaerial surface at this level. A general decrease in water content in the cores also is present at the contact, suggesting a period of dessication.…”
Section: Geological Significancesupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…KOLB and VAN LOPIK (1958) did not note this contact in their description of cores taken by the U. S. Army Engineers for the Mississippi River-Gulf outlet channel. LANKFORD and SHEPARD (1960), however, did note a faunal change to a marsh fauna, thus corroborating the conclusion of a subaerial surface at this level. A general decrease in water content in the cores also is present at the contact, suggesting a period of dessication.…”
Section: Geological Significancesupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Lithology, nature of layering, presence and nature of shells and wood fragments, and color or color variations of the sediments are criteria for recognition of facies units (Fig.4, 5). These criteria have been discussed at length as observable features of sediment samples (TREADWELL, 1955;SCRUTON, 1955;SHEPARD, 1956;MOORE and SCRUTON, 1957;VAN STRAATEN, 1959;LANKFORD and SHEPARD, 1960;forexample).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%