The investigation of metal−metal bonds has greatly promoted the development of structural and applied chemistry, which is also a special and important branch of organometallic chemistry. According to the structurally authenticated [1, Tren TMS U−RuCp(CO) 2 ] complex containing an unsupported U−Ru bond reported in an experiment, we have constructed a series of similar structures, [2, Tren P−iPr 2 U−RuCp(CO) 2 ], [3, Trapen TMS U−RuCp(CO) 2 ] and [4, ( Ad,Me ArO) 3 NU−RuCp(CO) 2 ], with different tripodal ligands and systematically analyzed the nature of U−Ru bonding by using scalar-relativistic quantum chemical calculations. On the basis of the analysis of the localized molecular orbital, the U−Ru bonds are predominantly composed of Ru 4d orbitals and partly U 6d and 5f orbitals, which indicates that the U−Ru bonds are highly polarized. Noticeably, the contribution of U 6d orbitals is smaller than that of U 5f orbitals for complex 4, which probably contributed to the peak U−Ru covalency based on the values of bond order, delocalization index, and quantum theory of atoms in molecules. The carbonyl stretching vibrational frequencies, the molecular orbitals, and the results of energy decomposition analysis indicate that the strength of the U−Ru bond in the four complexes increases in the following order: 2 < 1 < 3 < 4. This reveals that the U−Ru bond strength is sensitive to the tripodal ligands, including the substituent and skeleton. Furthermore, the binding energies indicate that complex 4 is more thermodynamically accessible. This work improves our understanding of the unsupported U−Ru complexes based on the tripodal ligand and is greatly significant for the selection of precursors to construct more stable actinide−metal bonds.