2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12039-019-1648-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facile crystallization of 2-phenyl benzimidazole-5-sulfonic acid: Characterization of lattice water dependent zwitterionic supramolecular forms, with modulation in proton conductivities

Abstract: A facile aqueous medium crystallization strategy has been found for this water insoluble title compound. Two crystalline forms, differing in the number of lattice water molecules (mono hydrated; form I & di-hydrated; form II), have been obtained, depending on the duration of crystallization. X-ray structural studies reveal that the compound crystallizes in the zwitterionic state in both the forms, due to the protonation of one imidazole nitrogen by-SO 3 H group, are engaged in hydrogen bonded interactions, inv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proton conductivity of 1 is not comparable to the ultrahigh proton conductivity of hydrogen-based organic framework (HOF) materials HOF-GS-10 (0.75 × 10 −2 S cm −1 ) and HOF-GS-11 (1.8 × 10 −2 S cm −1 ) at 30 °C and 95% relative humidity (RH), respectively [ 31 ]. However, it is several orders of magnitude higher than other reported HOFs, such as HOF-H 3 L (6.91 × 10 −5 S cm −1 ) at 100 °C and 98% RH [ 32 ], hydrated HOF-6a (3.4 × 10 −6 S cm −1 at 300 K and ∼97 % RH) [ 21 ] and the pair of zwitterionic supramolecular structures of 2-phenylbenzimidazole-5-sulfonicacid, with magnitudes of 1 × 10 −5 S cm −1 for the mono-hydrated form and 5 × 10 −5 S cm −1 for the di-hydrated form [ 33 ]. The decent proton conductivity of compound 1 may be explained by the continuous hydrogen bond pathway established by the ligands, guest water molecules and nitrate ions, as discussed in the structural section ( Figure 1 b) [ 34 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proton conductivity of 1 is not comparable to the ultrahigh proton conductivity of hydrogen-based organic framework (HOF) materials HOF-GS-10 (0.75 × 10 −2 S cm −1 ) and HOF-GS-11 (1.8 × 10 −2 S cm −1 ) at 30 °C and 95% relative humidity (RH), respectively [ 31 ]. However, it is several orders of magnitude higher than other reported HOFs, such as HOF-H 3 L (6.91 × 10 −5 S cm −1 ) at 100 °C and 98% RH [ 32 ], hydrated HOF-6a (3.4 × 10 −6 S cm −1 at 300 K and ∼97 % RH) [ 21 ] and the pair of zwitterionic supramolecular structures of 2-phenylbenzimidazole-5-sulfonicacid, with magnitudes of 1 × 10 −5 S cm −1 for the mono-hydrated form and 5 × 10 −5 S cm −1 for the di-hydrated form [ 33 ]. The decent proton conductivity of compound 1 may be explained by the continuous hydrogen bond pathway established by the ligands, guest water molecules and nitrate ions, as discussed in the structural section ( Figure 1 b) [ 34 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows the normalized intensity of the FT-IR spectra of PBS, chloride-LDH, and PBS-LDH. Neat PBS presents a peak at 1190 cm −1 , ascribed to the asymmetric stretches of the sulfonate group [26]. The symmetric stretching vibrations of the group correspond to the wavenumbers from 1030 cm −1 to 1090 cm −1 .…”
Section: Intercalation Of Pbs In Ldh and Determination Of The Composi...mentioning
confidence: 99%