Today, iridium compounds find so many varied applications in contemporary homogeneous catalysis it is difficult to recall that, until the late 1970s, rhodium was one of only two metals considered likely to serve as useful catalysts, at that time typically for hydrogenation or hydroformylation. Indeed, catalyst/solvent combinations such as [IrCl(PPh 3 ) 3 ]/MeOH, which were modeled directly on what was previously successful for rhodium, failed for iridium. Although iridium was still considered potentially to be useful, this was only for the demonstration of stoichiometric reactions related to proposed catalytic cycles. Iridium tends to form stronger metal-ligand bonds (e.g., Cp(CO)Rh-CO, 46 kcal mol -1 ; Cp(CO)Ir-CO, 57 kcal mol -1 ), and consequently compounds which act as reactive intermediates for rhodium can sometimes be isolated in the case of iridium.When low-coordinate iridium fragments in "non-coordinating" solvents (e.g., {Ir(PPh 3 ) 2 } + in CH 2 Cl 2 ) were found to be much more active than their rhodium analogues, it became clear that it is the dissociation of ligands or solvent -much slower for Ir versus Rh and for MeOH versus CH 2 Cl 2 -that leads to low catalytic rates with [IrCl(PPh 3 ) 3 ]/MeOH. The other steps in the catalytic cycle are often very fast for Ir, so if the need for dissociation is avoided, then highly active Ir catalysts can be formed. However, a new consensus has now emerged: rhodium catalysts are often considered to be slower but more selective, whilst iridium catalysts are faster but less selective.
Historical AspectsIridium made its first major mark in 1965, in the arena of organometallic chemistry with the discovery of Vaska's complex, [IrCl(CO)(PPh 3 ) 2 ] (1) [1]. Only weakly catalytic itself, Vaska's complex is nevertheless highly relevant to cataly-
31The Handbook of Homogeneous Hydrogenation. Edited by J. G. de Vries and C. J. Elsevier