2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facile preparation of amino functionalized graphene oxide decorated with Fe3O4 nanoparticles for the adsorption of Cr(VI)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
114
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 371 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
7
114
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[26][27][28] This indicates that we can effectively the chromic oxide content in the leather shavings for the adsorption of CR, which has -NH 2 groups. Lastly, cost of metallic compounds usually limits their use as adsorbents, while leather shavings are cheap and abundant disposals.…”
Section: -14mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[26][27][28] This indicates that we can effectively the chromic oxide content in the leather shavings for the adsorption of CR, which has -NH 2 groups. Lastly, cost of metallic compounds usually limits their use as adsorbents, while leather shavings are cheap and abundant disposals.…”
Section: -14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in approximately neutral pH, weight loss of chromium in the biochar reached in surface water. 28,33,34 As pH of CR solution is at $7.0, 35 the following experiment was performed without adjusting the pH of aqueous solution.…”
Section: Adsorption For Crmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effluents containing a high Cr(VI) concentration from these industries are undesirably discharged into the aquatic environment [79]. The chrome tanning process is the most preferred among 80% of tannery industries in India and most of them discharge untreated wastewater into nearby water bodies [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) Q m (mg/g)Sorbents (ref. ) Q m (mg/g)AMGO 34 123.40Al 2 O 3 nanofibres 35 204.10Fe-SC 36 148.99Fe 3 O 4 @TiO 2 37 118.80Fe 3 O 4 /GO 38 69.49Layered double oxides/carbon 39 354.2Magnetic cucurbit[6]uril/GO 40 122.50g-C 3 N 4 @Ni-Mg-Al-LDH 41 99.7Oxime-grafted CMK-5 42 62.00 l -C 3 N 4 /PDA/PEI 3 43 60.51Polyacrylamide–hydroxyapatite 44 0.95TiO 2-x 45 65Polypyrrole 46 87.72CaTiO x ; CaAlO x 47 241.7; 258.29Amidoxime modified Fe 3 O 4 @SiO 2 48 105.50Titanate 49 358Modified silica gel 50 90.30CNFs 51 125Birnessite-modified pine biochar 52 47.05p-AO/ CNFs; c-AO/CNFs 53 588.24; 263.18Talc 54 41.60RUB-15 55 152MnO 2 –Fe 3 O 4 –RGO 56 108.70GO-CS-P 57 779.44SA/CMC-Ca-Al 58 101.76Ca/Al-LDH@CNTs 59 382.9Phosphate-modified pine wood sawdust 60 74.10GO (Present study)16.03GOMO (Present study)153.85…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%