2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.03.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facile preparation of isotactic polypropylene microporous membranes with bioinspired hierarchical morphology for nano-scale water-in-oil emulsion separation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the density of the PDMS microsphere aerogel is much lower than that of PVDF nanofibers, the PDMS microspheres are suspended in the high-voltage electric field, which descend slowly and mainly coat on the nanofiber surface. Consequently, Si elements could be only observed on the microspheres, while the F elements appear on both the microspheres and the nanofibers. The structure of the PVDF/PDMS nanofiber membranes is similar to the results reported previously. During this process, the monomers of PDMS solution and PVDF solution could hardly be mixed uniformly in the needles; however, the PVDF solution and PDMS solution could still diffuse each other. The PDMS microspheres could be formed at first since the viscosity of the outer solution is not high enough to form stable a Taylor’s cone. , Notably, some of the PVDF solution diffused into the outside solution surrounded by the PDMS microspheres, as THF evaporates more quickly than DMF. Due to the solidification of the PDMS, the evaporation rate of DMF becomes slower.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As the density of the PDMS microsphere aerogel is much lower than that of PVDF nanofibers, the PDMS microspheres are suspended in the high-voltage electric field, which descend slowly and mainly coat on the nanofiber surface. Consequently, Si elements could be only observed on the microspheres, while the F elements appear on both the microspheres and the nanofibers. The structure of the PVDF/PDMS nanofiber membranes is similar to the results reported previously. During this process, the monomers of PDMS solution and PVDF solution could hardly be mixed uniformly in the needles; however, the PVDF solution and PDMS solution could still diffuse each other. The PDMS microspheres could be formed at first since the viscosity of the outer solution is not high enough to form stable a Taylor’s cone. , Notably, some of the PVDF solution diffused into the outside solution surrounded by the PDMS microspheres, as THF evaporates more quickly than DMF. Due to the solidification of the PDMS, the evaporation rate of DMF becomes slower.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…A capillary flow porometer (3H-2000PB, BeShiDe Inc., Beijing, China) was utilized to test the pore size distribution of the microporous membranes [ 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ] under ASTM F316. The porosity (A k ) of the membranes was determined using the n-butanol adsorption method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 To date, various inorganic and organic membranes have been developed and used for purpose of oil-water separation. [6][7][8] Flexible polymer-based membranes have received a lot of interests because they have shown outstanding and unique superiorities. Nowadays, various polymer membranes have been developed, such as polystyrene, 8 polyacrylonitrile, 9,10 polyimide, 11 polysulfone, 12 polyvinylidene fluoride, 13,14 polypropylene, 7 polyurethane 15 and so forth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] Flexible polymer-based membranes have received a lot of interests because they have shown outstanding and unique superiorities. Nowadays, various polymer membranes have been developed, such as polystyrene, 8 polyacrylonitrile, 9,10 polyimide, 11 polysulfone, 12 polyvinylidene fluoride, 13,14 polypropylene, 7 polyurethane 15 and so forth. Among them, nanofiber polymer membranes further have virtues as high porosity, large specific surface area, and homogeneity of fiber pore size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%