2021
DOI: 10.1039/d0nr07991j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facile synthesis of 3D Ni@C nanocomposites derived from two kinds of petal-like Ni-based MOFs towards lightweight and efficient microwave absorbers

Abstract: 3D conductive networks constructed by decorating petal-like Ni-based MOFs on the surface of graphene nanosheets exhibit superior microwave absorption properties.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…56 The typical relaxation loss is Debye dielectric relaxation. But when it comes to the high conductivity absorber in our work, the Debye model needs to be modified and the ε ′′ can be expressed as: 57,58 where is the polarization loss part of the dielectric loss, is the conduction loss part of the dielectric loss, ε s is the static permittivity at the low frequency limit, ε ∞ is the relative permittivity at the high frequency limit, τ is the relaxation time, f is the frequency, σ is the electrical conductivity, and ε 0 is the permittivity of vacuum. The conduction loss and polarization loss calculated by using eqn (5) are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…56 The typical relaxation loss is Debye dielectric relaxation. But when it comes to the high conductivity absorber in our work, the Debye model needs to be modified and the ε ′′ can be expressed as: 57,58 where is the polarization loss part of the dielectric loss, is the conduction loss part of the dielectric loss, ε s is the static permittivity at the low frequency limit, ε ∞ is the relative permittivity at the high frequency limit, τ is the relaxation time, f is the frequency, σ is the electrical conductivity, and ε 0 is the permittivity of vacuum. The conduction loss and polarization loss calculated by using eqn (5) are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7d), so the source of magnetic loss is not only eddy current loss, but also natural resonance and exchange resonance. 43,44 Natural resonance often occurs in the low frequency region, while exchange resonance often occurs in the high frequency region. 45 Therefore, that formed at 6 GHz and at the lower frequency band is attributed to natural resonance, and that formed near 11.5 GHz is attributed to exchange resonance.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lv et al employed ZIF-67 as the precursor to produce porous Co/C nanocomposites with reflection loss (RL) intensity of − 35.3 dB and effective absorption bandwidth (EAB) of 5.8 GHz with the absorber thickness of 4.0 and 2.5 mm, respectively [29]. To date, there have been hundreds of papers concerned on EM absorption of MOFsderived magnetic carbon-based composites, and most microwave absorbers therein did make some significant achievements as compared with those counterparts from conventional routes [29,31,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. Despite of that, these MOFs-derived magnetic carbon-based composites still suffer from some undesirable drawbacks.…”
Section: Inte Nsif Ied Pol Ariz Atio N Rela Xati Onmentioning
confidence: 99%