2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facile synthesis of biomass-derived porous carbons incorporated with CuO nanoparticles as promising electrode materials for high-performance supercapacitor applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy densities of our device are in the range of 20.86 to 24.20 Wh kg −1 (0.26 to 0.30 Wh cm −2 ), corresponding to the power densities of 2.14 to 0.65 kW kg −1 (26.49 to 8.08 W cm −2 ). The energy densities are competitive with some other Cu x O-based supercapacitors (Table S2) [26,27,36,38,39,[43][44][45]. For instance, a 3D Cu 2 O@Cu nanoneedle arrays electrode had an energy density of 26.0 Wh kg −1 at power density of 1.8 kW kg −1 [27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The energy densities of our device are in the range of 20.86 to 24.20 Wh kg −1 (0.26 to 0.30 Wh cm −2 ), corresponding to the power densities of 2.14 to 0.65 kW kg −1 (26.49 to 8.08 W cm −2 ). The energy densities are competitive with some other Cu x O-based supercapacitors (Table S2) [26,27,36,38,39,[43][44][45]. For instance, a 3D Cu 2 O@Cu nanoneedle arrays electrode had an energy density of 26.0 Wh kg −1 at power density of 1.8 kW kg −1 [27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrode has unchanged phase compositions after cycling, and the Cu x O flakes become thicker than the initial structure (Figure S12 and inset of Figure 5i). We compared the specific capacitance of Cu x O-based electrodes, as shown in Table S1 [ [25][26][27]36,38,39,[41][42][43][44][45], and the results reveal that our electrode is comparable to the pure Cu x O material but inferior, compared to the Cu x O-based composites. Further investigations might be carried out to fabricate hybrid electrodes based on our materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These high values are comparable to those previously reported in the literature for AC/metal oxide materials. For example, L‐Co 3 O 4 //AC device possessed 23 Wh kg −1 at 400.6 W kg −1 , [ 56 ] CuO‐AC//AC device showed 11.7 Wh kg −1 at 628.7 W kg −1 , [ 57 ] Co‐Al‐Ox/Sy@LSCN//LSCN device demonstrated 21.8 Wh kg −1 at 374 W kg −1 , [ 58 ] NiS‐Ni@C//WS‐AC device exhibited 28 Wh kg −1 at 380 W kg −1 , [ 59 ] CBPC‐2‐800@MnO X //CBPC‐2‐800@MnO X device showed 8.4 Wh kg −1 at 1000 W kg −1 , [ 60 ] and the energy density of CCAC‐Fe‐M‐50%//CCAC‐Fe‐M‐50% device was equal to 9.6 Wh kg −1 at 250 W kg −1 . [ 61 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CuO to prepare hybrid composites for energy storage, [162][163][164] which helps improve the charge/discharge cycle stability and storage capacity of the nanostructured composites. [165] Ghosh and co-workers synthesized nanocomposite with a stacked layered structure in which CuO nanosheets were deposited onto rGO.…”
Section: Cu-omentioning
confidence: 99%