2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facile synthesis of cellulose nanofiber nanocomposite as a SERS substrate for detection of thiram in juice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 9a shows the SERS spectra of thiram with concentrations increasing from 10 −8 to 10 −3 mol/L. From Figure 9a, it can be found that the Raman characteristic peaks of thiram appear at 560, 928, 1150, 1386 and 1514 cm −1 , respectively, which are consistent with the results reported in the literature [38]. At the same time, within the concentration range shown in this figure, the intensity of characteristic peak at 1386 cm −1 was used as the quantitative basis to evaluate the SERS sensitivity.…”
Section: Sers Activities For Small Moleculessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Figure 9a shows the SERS spectra of thiram with concentrations increasing from 10 −8 to 10 −3 mol/L. From Figure 9a, it can be found that the Raman characteristic peaks of thiram appear at 560, 928, 1150, 1386 and 1514 cm −1 , respectively, which are consistent with the results reported in the literature [38]. At the same time, within the concentration range shown in this figure, the intensity of characteristic peak at 1386 cm −1 was used as the quantitative basis to evaluate the SERS sensitivity.…”
Section: Sers Activities For Small Moleculessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…To further evaluate the SERS sensitivity, the CS@PDA@AgNPs swabs were immersed into an NBA solution with different concentration ranging from 1 × 10 −3 to 1 × 10 −11 M. After the CS@PDA@AgNPs swabs were dried, the responding SERS spectra were collected. From Figure 5a, the Raman signal intensity of the NBA molecules decreased promptly with concentrations ranging from 1 × 10 −3 to 1 × 10 −11 M. When the NBA concentration was lower than 1 × 10 −10 M, the characteristic peaks, such as at 591 cm −1 and 1640 cm −1 , could still be observed [41,42]. If the concentration further decreased to 1 × 10 −11 M, the above characteristic Raman peaks of the NBA molecules could not be distinctly detected, and the limit of detection (LOD) for the NBA molecules was approximately 1 × 10 −10 M. Furthermore, Figure 5b shows the relationship of the signal intensity of the NBA molecules with the solution concentration from 1 × 10 −3 to 1 × 10 −10 M. According to the characteristic peak intensities at 591 cm −1 , the signal intensity of the NBA molecules was sharply enhanced with an increase of the corresponding logarithmic concentration, which was fairly favorable to the quantitative determination for target molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanocellulose/polypyrrole [111] Nanocellulose/polyethylene [112] Graphene/nanocellulose/silicon [113] Solar cells/panels Nanofibers from sisal with graphene oxide [73] (Super)capacitors Bacterial nanocellulose/carbon nanotubes/triblock-copolymer ion gels [114] Nanocellulose with polyaniline [115] Acoustics Membranes for loudspeakers Cellulose nanofibers with Fe3O4 nanoparticles [71] (Bio)sensors Optical SERSbased Detection of pesticides, dyes, bacteria [116,117] Optical fluorescencebased Detection of heavy metals [118] Detection of thiols [119] Detection of elastase [120] Chemical Detection of vapors (NH3.H2O, H2O, HCl, acetic acid) [16] Electrochemical Detection of cations in biological fluids (Na + , K + , Ca 2+ ) [38] Detection of cholesterol [121] Detection of avian leukosis virus [122] Piezoelectric Based on bacterial cellulose [123] Based on plant-derived cellulose nanofibrils [124] Based on nanocellulose with chitosan [125] Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 14 December 2018 Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 14 December 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201812.0170.v1…”
Section: Lithium Batteriesmentioning
confidence: 99%