2019
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-41522019177951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facilitadores e barreiras no desenvolvimento da gestão ambiental em instituições de educação superior: análise dos relatórios de sustentabilidade da Global Reporting Initiative

Abstract: RESUMO O objetivo deste trabalho é identificar quais características das instituições de educação superior (IES) atuam como facilitadoras ou barreiras no desenvolvimento de ações de gestão ambiental. A análise de regressão beta de 38 relatórios de sustentabilidade elaborados conforme as diretrizes da Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) mostrou que a facilidade de acesso a recursos financeiros, a existência de plano ou política ambiental/de sustentabilidade e a natureza pública da instituição podem ser considerad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, di Tullio and La Torre (2022) highlighted the risk that the dispersion of sustainability information on universities’ websites will deinstitutionalise the practice of SR. Moreover, as noted by Brandao et al (2019), the high complexity of the universities’ administrative structure and the co-existence of several campuses can increase the complexity and hamper the data collection during the reporting process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, di Tullio and La Torre (2022) highlighted the risk that the dispersion of sustainability information on universities’ websites will deinstitutionalise the practice of SR. Moreover, as noted by Brandao et al (2019), the high complexity of the universities’ administrative structure and the co-existence of several campuses can increase the complexity and hamper the data collection during the reporting process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%