2014
DOI: 10.1111/jpc.12638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facilitated group supervision: Harnessing the power of peers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(107 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have asserted good corporate image as a significant benefit of clinical supervision. [21,22] Quality control, creativity, and professionalism are depicted, making the facility attractive to consumers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have asserted good corporate image as a significant benefit of clinical supervision. [21,22] Quality control, creativity, and professionalism are depicted, making the facility attractive to consumers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature identifies a range of benefits from the use of group supervision in professional practice with positive factors such as supporting individuals in their professional roles and responsibilities, sharing, and learning from each other's experiences and developing team-working and leadership skills being cited (O'Keeffe & James, 2014;Snowden et al, 2020). Group supervision was facilitated once a week using a tripartite approach where the students, project leads within the health board and two university practice education members met to reflect on and share progress and address learning needs.…”
Section: Group Supervision Sessionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peer approaches are differentiated from traditional supervision models in that there is no designated power, authority or hierarchical relationship [16]. Clinical supervision in medical education is crucial and desirable [16][17][18][19], but research on clinical supervision in groups of postgraduates working in the medical professions is sparse, although it has increased in recent years [1][2][3][4][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: The Supervision Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%