2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2003.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facilitating natural regeneration in Saccharum spontaneum (L.) grasslands within the Panama Canal Watershed: effects of tree species and tree structure on vegetation recruitment patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
58
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Trees that attract a spectrum of frugivores are recommended (Martinez-Garza & Howe 2003), especially large-seeded forest species, as they have the highest performance in the Saccharum. Tall tree species with a high crown density should be considered, as they promote bird dispersal (Jones et al 2004); this may increase diversity. Planting shrubs and large monocots would further increase diversity by attracting bats and agoutis.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trees that attract a spectrum of frugivores are recommended (Martinez-Garza & Howe 2003), especially large-seeded forest species, as they have the highest performance in the Saccharum. Tall tree species with a high crown density should be considered, as they promote bird dispersal (Jones et al 2004); this may increase diversity. Planting shrubs and large monocots would further increase diversity by attracting bats and agoutis.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies throughout the tropics have found that tree plantations can serve as 'catalysts' for secondary regeneration in these areas, whereby they increase the stem density and species richness of understory plant communities compared to areas without planted trees (Parrotta et al 1997;Lamb et al 2005). The mechanisms responsible for these increases are thought to be trees' ability to attract seed-dispersers (Wunderle 1997), suppress grasses through shading (Kuusipalo et al 1995;Jones et al 2004), and improve soil conditions through litter inputs (Parrotta 1992). However, tree species vary greatly in their effects on understory regeneration (Powers et al 1997;Slocum and Horvitz 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canopy cover influences woody recruitment through a number of mechanisms including: enhancing bird activity and thereby dispersal of zoochorous seeds (Howe 1990;Jones et al 2004;Fink et al 2009); reducing cover of light-demanding pasture grasses (Holl 2002a;Hooper et al 2002); providing intermediate light conditions favorable for tree growth (Loik and Holl 2001); and enhancing nutrient availability (Siddique et al 2008;Celentano et al 2011). These mechanisms are all likely operating at our sites, but it is impossible to evaluate their relative importance without manipulating them independently.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%