1959
DOI: 10.3109/13813455909074432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facilitation Et Inhibition Des Potentiels Évoqués Corticaux Dans L'éveil Cérébral

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1961
1961
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that potentiation appears only after transection of the brain stem leads to the assumption that the transection eliminates ascending tonic inhibiting influences from below the level of the lesion and possibly also leads to an increased action of facilitatory connexions from above the lesion level. This assumption is supported by the observations of Bremer & Stoupel (1959) which show that stimulation of the mesencephalic reticular formation facilitates the secondary response, although this effect was obtained only by concurrent electrical stimulation of the optic pathway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The fact that potentiation appears only after transection of the brain stem leads to the assumption that the transection eliminates ascending tonic inhibiting influences from below the level of the lesion and possibly also leads to an increased action of facilitatory connexions from above the lesion level. This assumption is supported by the observations of Bremer & Stoupel (1959) which show that stimulation of the mesencephalic reticular formation facilitates the secondary response, although this effect was obtained only by concurrent electrical stimulation of the optic pathway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Iwama & Yamamoto (1961) have shown that if the sensory cortex is removed the thalamic potentials recorded after a peripheral stimulus are increased in size. Dumont & Dell (1958) and Bremer & Stoupel (1959) have reported that the response of the visual cortex to stimulation of the optic nerve was increased while stimulating the reticular formation, and this effect they believed to be due more to a change in the responsiveness of the cortex than to a change in afferent transmission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volleys of the initial impulses evoked by the photic stimulus will 2) Electrically evoked cortical response. Bremer and Stoupel (1959) and Bremer (1961) found that the effects of reticular arousal upon the evoked cortical response varied depending upon the stimulus modality. When a 'peripheral' photic test stimulation was applied to the retina, the evoked cortical response was depressed strikingly by the RF-stimulation.…”
Section: ) Electrically Evoked Response Light-potentiation and Re-smentioning
confidence: 99%