2016
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facilitation in communities: underlying mechanisms, community and ecosystem implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
98
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
98
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Schöb, Prieto, Armas, and Pugnaire () found a cost to A. tetraquetra for hosting subordinate species which increased with increasing subordinate cover. This suggests that costs and benefits of foundation species are not only species‐specific but likely depend on traits of both foundation and subordinated species (Michalet & Pugnaire, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Schöb, Prieto, Armas, and Pugnaire () found a cost to A. tetraquetra for hosting subordinate species which increased with increasing subordinate cover. This suggests that costs and benefits of foundation species are not only species‐specific but likely depend on traits of both foundation and subordinated species (Michalet & Pugnaire, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, for both species richness and abundance we found a unimodal relationship between RII and temperature stress and a linear curve along the drought gradient, the former supporting the collapse of facilitation model (Michalet et al , , Holmgren and Scheffer ) and the latter supporting the Stress gradient hypothesis (SGH, Bertness and Callaway ). Contrasting response curves along environmental gradients have been found in plant–plant interaction experiments and these discrepancies have induced an important and still not solved debate in the literature (Maestre et al , Callaway , He and Bertness , Soliveres and Maestre , Michalet et al , Michalet and Pugnaire , Liancourt et al ). The most accepted explanation is that unimodal curves should be more frequent along resource or disturbance gradients, due to the switchback of competition in resource‐poor conditions or to the collapse of facilitation in highly disturbed conditions, respectively, whereas linear increases in facilitation should be more frequent along non‐resource gradients such as temperature gradients (Michalet , Maestre et al , Michalet et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, this disparity is diminishing within some fields of ecology (e.g. Michalet & Pugnaire, ; Simberloff & Von Holle, ). Due to bigheaded carps' ability to exploit large portions of zooplankton production (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%