2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2017.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facilitative reforms, democratic accountability, social accounting and learning representative initiatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example: Harney (2011) examined accounting for African migrants in Naples through an ethnographic study; Gibbon (2012) uses an auto-ethnographic approach to consider how her understandings of accountability changed through engagement. Further examples of non-traditional theoretical framing in CPA include governmentality ( Johansen, 2008), Gorz's revolutionary vs reformist approach to change (Lee and Cassell, 2017) and vulnerability .…”
Section: Engaging With Organisationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example: Harney (2011) examined accounting for African migrants in Naples through an ethnographic study; Gibbon (2012) uses an auto-ethnographic approach to consider how her understandings of accountability changed through engagement. Further examples of non-traditional theoretical framing in CPA include governmentality ( Johansen, 2008), Gorz's revolutionary vs reformist approach to change (Lee and Cassell, 2017) and vulnerability .…”
Section: Engaging With Organisationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their article, Lee and Cassell (2017) focus on trade unions, conducting a longitudinal and international comparative case study to determine how critical accountants contribute to workers' development. Based on the ideas of Gorz (1967), the authors focus on facilitative reforms of learning representative initiatives in the UK and New Zealand and how these reforms and initiatives led to democratic accountability and associated forms of social accounting.…”
Section: Aaaj 349mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dialogic accounting and dialogic engagements are premised on the notion of enabling oppressed communities to understand the nature of their oppressions, building the capacity of communities to produce accounts of how they experience the world in order to present these accounts of their truth to those abusing their power as part of a transformative project (Freire, 2002). However, dialogic accounting can only ever be part of a transformative project if there is a requirement for a collective acceptance for dialogue before any emancipatory changes (Lee and Cassell, 2017;Gallhofer et al, 2015). There is therefore a need to evaluate any accounts as symbolic engagement practices that form part of broader campaigns for transformation.…”
Section: Dialogic Accounting Accountability and Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We contend that ultimately dialogic accounting should lead to praxis leading to less oppressive modes of living. In particular, sustainable dialogic accounting should allow different individuals, communities or organisations to translate the problems, consequences and possible solutions of others into their everyday actions, values and cultures to enable transformative dialogue, co-operative engagement and transformation (Bebbington et al, 2007;Dillard and Roslender, 2011;Lee and Cassell, 2017).…”
Section: Dialogic Accounting Accountability and Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%