Facilitators and barriers to social and community participation following spinal cord injury

Barclay, Linda; McDonald, Rachael; Lentin, Primrose; Bourke-Taylor, Helen

doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12241

Cited by 154 publications

(157 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

140

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…4,5 Rehabilitation efforts to promote engagement in meaningful community activities can also contribute to health-related quality of life. 58 Case formulations require accurate identification of those individuals at risk of experiencing poor psychosocial outcomes. 57 Validated self-reported health indices for the SCI group include condition-specific measures, such as the Spinal Cord Lesion Coping Strategies Questionnaire 50 and Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale, 59 which assess passive and active behavioural coping.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychosocial aspects of spinal cord injury pain: a meta-analysis

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Study design: Meta-analysis. Objectives: Although the association between modifiable psychosocial factors and spinal cord injury (SCI) pain has been identified, the full range of psychological and social difficulties for those who experience acute and/or persistent pain remains unclear. This metaanalysis consolidates the available evidence, using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference framework. Methods: Nineteen studies that examined persistent neuropathic, nociceptive or mixed pain subtypes in adults with a SCI (newly acquired and chronic; N participants = 2934) were identified from electronic database searches. Standardised mean differences between SCI pain and no-pain groups on self-reported psychosocial outcomes were calculated, along with 95% confidence intervals, fail-safe Ns and heterogeneity statistics.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychosocial aspects of spinal cord injury pain: a meta-analysis

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The urban integration is supposed to attend from 2016 with mass transportation about 63% of the population (4,080,277 habitants), a big improvement, compared to 2009 when it was attending only 18% (1,165,793 habitants) [27]. On the other hand, social aspects as seeking for a healthier life quality or respect the rights of disabled people, for example the access to parking spaces [28], only had a small impact in games time. A very important aspect during the bidding process to host the Games is usually the security, however it has no significantly long-term social impact [29].…”

Section: Politic and Social Aspectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rio 2016: Experience of Latin American Stakeholders

Held¹,

Hodeck²,

Hovemann³

et al. 2018

JSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mega sport events have been in the focus of scientific work since years. Most of the authors deal with effects, impacts or the legacy of them, concentrating on economic aspects in that field. This study uses a stakeholder approach and tries to examine peculiarly the whole range of the Olympic Games of Rio 2016 by using a qualitative research method. Stakeholders from Latin America were asked about their expectations and perceived experiences regarding the first games in South America. Even if from different perspectives, respondents expected and perceived both positive and negative effects through RIO 2016. Their wishes were related to their individual development, further development of sports, intercultural exchange, and social learning. A similarly varied picture may be observed regarding the experiences perceived. In order to determine a comprehensive picture of RIO 2016 and its legacy, it is important to do a short-term as well as a long-term investigation.

show abstract

“…An individual's capacity to reintegrate into home and community life following SCI is a crucial aspect of establishing improvements in wellbeing and life satisfaction (Barclay et al, 2015;Boschen, Tonack & Gargaro, 2003;Larsson Lund, 2005). Research to date has demonstrated that social and community participation for people with SCI continues to be an area of ongoing challenge (Barclay, McDonald, Lentin & Bourke-Taylor, 2016;Carpenter et al, 2007;Lysack, Komanecky, Kabel, Cross & Neufeld, 2007;Noreau & Fougeyrollas, 2000). In a study of 136 people with SCI who were on average 11.5 years post-injury, Lysack and colleagues found a statistically significant relationship between perceived environmental barriers and community integration for adults with SCI (Lysack et al, 2007).…”

Section: Community Integration and Scimentioning

confidence: 99%