2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-018-1058-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facilitators and constrainers of civilian–military collaboration: the Swedish perspectives

Abstract: Purpose An increasing number of international and domestic armed conflicts, including terror attacks on civilians, along with constrained healthcare finance and resource limitation, has made a civilian-military collaboration (CMC) crucial. The purpose of this study was to identify facilitators and constrainers in CMC in a national perspective with a specific focus on medical aspects. Method A literature review of recently published papers about civilian-military collaboration, along with a short survey, was co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are some differences between the experts and the public's views on feasible measures, the sum of all choices defines what an immediate responder should be able to do (Table 8). These findings are in line with earlier reports, of which some claim much more involvement by the public in the medical management of victims of MCIs [1,2,18,[22][23][24][25][26][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. In this study, the Swedish public expressed a high willingness to get engaged in the treatment of victims by stabilizing fractures, neck and lower back, implementing a cervical collar, and defending against a perpetrator, which are tasks that were not approved by the expert group or is dangerous for their lives.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there are some differences between the experts and the public's views on feasible measures, the sum of all choices defines what an immediate responder should be able to do (Table 8). These findings are in line with earlier reports, of which some claim much more involvement by the public in the medical management of victims of MCIs [1,2,18,[22][23][24][25][26][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. In this study, the Swedish public expressed a high willingness to get engaged in the treatment of victims by stabilizing fractures, neck and lower back, implementing a cervical collar, and defending against a perpetrator, which are tasks that were not approved by the expert group or is dangerous for their lives.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…An increasing number of mass casualty incidents (MCIs) in recent years has revealed some major shortcomings in the medical and non-medical aspects of its management [1][2][3][4]. Besides natural disasters and armed conflicts, terrorism and mass shootings have emerged as main causes of mass injuries, deaths, and global threats [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dental and veterinary professionals with a capacity to contribute either with human or material resources would not be used. 14,15,[17][18][19] Primary/ community healthcare centers with competency in preventive services, ideally located in all parts of the community, and with the ability to improve patients´ resilience and ability to cope with unexpected emergencies would not be adequately utilized.…”
Section: Failed Communication and Collaboration With Othermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12,31 Discussion Surge capacity (primary and secondary) is the first step required to respond to the imbalance between needs and resources during a MID. 1,[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][11][12][13][14]17,23 FSC is a novel concept, which offers an alternative to further scale up or down the MID management process by using civilians and other available entities and facilities.…”
Section: How To Achieve Fscmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Swedish defence healthcare system strongly depends on the support of civilian healthcare during increased levels of mobilisation [6]. Swedish legislation requires public healthcare institutions to maintain MCI preparedness including wartime scenarios [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%