“…The literature on the relations between threats and authoritarianism shows that people can react to threats by resorting to secondary sources of control, with the function of compensating the loss of direct control over their life and environment (e.g., Kay et al., 2008). Before COVID‐19, the literature mainly focused on the existential threats stemming from natural disasters (e.g., Russo et al., 2020), climate disasters (e.g., Zapata, 2018), and economic crises (e.g., Chen, 2010), showing the role of compensatory sources of control played by religion (e.g., Sibley and Bulbulia, 2012), the government (e.g., Oneal, Lian, and Joyner, 1996), and, most importantly for this study, anti‐democratic authorities (Mirisola et al., 2014). In line with this, more recent studies indicated that the COVID‐19 pandemic has led to an increase in religiousness and church attendance (e.g., Molteni et al., 2021), trust in the government (e.g., Bol et al., 2021), and anti‐democratic attitudes and preferences (e.g., Amat et al., 2020; Roccato et al., 2020).…”