1985
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.1041220308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FACS analysis of a hyperthermia‐induced alteration in Hoechst 33342 permeability and direct measurement of its relationship to cell survival

Abstract: Heat-induced alterations in CHO-10B cell Hoechst 33342 (Ho342) permeability in vitro were analyzed by flow cytometry. Immediately after 45.5 degrees C heating, uptake was decreased in a dose-dependent manner with cytotoxicity. Kinetic analysis indicated that a treatment that reduced cell survival to approximately 10%, reduced the maximal velocity, Vmax, to 53% of control and increased the dissociation constant, Km, to 156% of control. Also, little change in Ho342 efflux was found to occur from control up to 90… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dye uptake measurements on a per-well and per-cell basis may depend upon a number of factors, including cell size, adherence vs. suspension culture, the phase of the cell cycle and metabolic activity. Uptake of Hoechst 33342 is increased during S phase in HeLa cells (Frankfurt 1983), as well as in cells exposed to hyperthermia (Rice et al 1985). These factors need to be taken into account for well-by-well comparisons of different cell types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dye uptake measurements on a per-well and per-cell basis may depend upon a number of factors, including cell size, adherence vs. suspension culture, the phase of the cell cycle and metabolic activity. Uptake of Hoechst 33342 is increased during S phase in HeLa cells (Frankfurt 1983), as well as in cells exposed to hyperthermia (Rice et al 1985). These factors need to be taken into account for well-by-well comparisons of different cell types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has not been the scope of this report, and it had not been possible either, to get a complete knowledge of all membrane damaging and -interfering agents, but merely to outline differences between the various types of membrane damage. In addition to the types of membrane damage tested here a few more could be mentioned: mechanical damage; hyperthermia that may partly act as a membrane damage [17], and freezing of cells. Most other types of membrane damage may be classified in one of the above groups as for instance complement-or virus-in duced membrane damage that may be ex plained more or less by a detergent-like ef fect [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%