2014
DOI: 10.4103/0253-7176.127253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factitious Disorder-Experience at a Neuropsychiatric Center in Southern India

Abstract: Objective:Factitious disorder is amongst the more intriguing but less-studied psychological disorders. Studies from different parts of the world have reported of varying prevalence rates. Here, we try to study the prevalence of factitious disorder in a specific sample of patients attending a neuropsychiatric center in India.Materials and Methods:We did a retrospective review of our institute's database for cases with a diagnosis of factitious disorder in the 10-year duration from 2001 to 2010. We reviewed the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of FD varies according to several factors. For example, the type of patient population, study setting, and clinical suspicion and awareness manifested by the healthcare professional can influence the prevalence of this disorder [ 13 ]. In the present study, out of the patients attending KAMC from January 2015 to December 2020, only seven patients were assigned the diagnosis of FD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The prevalence of FD varies according to several factors. For example, the type of patient population, study setting, and clinical suspicion and awareness manifested by the healthcare professional can influence the prevalence of this disorder [ 13 ]. In the present study, out of the patients attending KAMC from January 2015 to December 2020, only seven patients were assigned the diagnosis of FD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, out of the patients attending KAMC from January 2015 to December 2020, only seven patients were assigned the diagnosis of FD. According to previous studies, the prevalence of FD among psychiatry inpatients varied between 0.5 and 8% [ 13 ]. We believe that our results showed a relatively low prevalence rate, which may be attributed to a reduced awareness of FD among clinicians and due to the difficulty in the diagnosis of the disorder [ 7 , 11 , 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Practical difficulties in the diagnosis of psychiatric disorders in people with FD include factors such as atypical, dramatic, vague, and inconsistent presentation of symptoms in different medical specialties. Suspicion is the key point to diagnose FD (5). Although it may be upsetting to suspect a patient of violating the basic and implicit patient-doctor contract, which is based on mutual trust, it seems necessary to maintain an index of suspicion for factitious causes of medical and psychiatric diagnoses, even in children and adolescents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1 ] FD or DA has to be distinguished from malingering by “sick role” seeking commonly seen in DA in contrast to external incentives acting as the motivating factor in malingering. [ 2 ] We report a case of DA in a 38-year-old female with localized alopecia of the right half of eyebrow and anterior part of right side of the scalp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%