Factor analysis of construction practices for infrastructure projects in Korea

Abstract

Although extensive research has been undertaken on practices influencing the success of construction projects, very little of this research contains information relevant to the critical success factors of Korean infrastructure projects. The object of this paper is to gain an understanding of the practices influencing infrastructure construction in Korea. This was achieved through a study conducted by 136 Korean construction professionals. A questionnaire survey was conducted to gather opinions from experts in the construction industry. The initial analysis of the 28 practices considered in this study proposed 22 best practices based upon the mean value of each practice. Analysis of variance revealed that the opinions of the experts are not significantly different regardless of their organization, designation, and experience. Further analysis, based on a factor analysis, shows that the practices could be grouped into six critical success factors-selection of a competitive contractor, pre-project planning, contract strategy, engineering enforcement, contract guarantee, and lessons learned feedback. The critical success factors presented in this paper can be used as a check list to prepare and implement public infrastructure projects in Korea. Furthermore, it will also provide information on general concepts involved in the preparations of international construction projects.

Demystifying the Barriers to Transport Infrastructure Project Development in Fast Developing Regions: The Case of China

“…As revealed in previous studies, this analytical approach is helpful to detect any barrier that was considered critical by respondents [52,53]. Given two items with same mean values, the item with a higher standard deviation (SD) deserves a lower ranking [54].…”

“…The work by Long et al attributed the problems of large construction projects to be organizational, project attributes-related, coordination-related and environmental problems [36]. To improve the perception of infrastructure development, Park and Kwon decomposed infrastructure practices in Korea into five phases: planning and engineering, project budget, bid and contract, construction, and post-construction [53]. There appears to be no apparent agreements among researchers on theoretical construct for exploring the barriers, and this will definitely undermine the reasonableness of the results.…”

Multivariate GR&R through factor analysis

“…analysis is yet widely applied as multivariate analysis method in the psychology field, but the recent advances helped to disseminate the method to other fields such as biology, social sciences, economics [21] and lately in engineering [25][26][27][28][29]. In factor analysis, each variable is described as a linear function in terms of common factors and specific factors.…”

An Analytical Hierarchy Process of Delay causes in Highway Construction Projects in Iran

“…They identified the most important factors as follow; contractor and owner's ability, contractor and consultant's ability, outside effects, designer's ability, and supervisors' ability. Park and Kwon (2011) considered influencing factors in infrastructure construction in South Korea. Six critical success factors were recognized namely: competitive contractor, pre-project planning, contract strategy, engineering enforcement, contract guarantee, lessons learned feedback.…”