2016
DOI: 10.4236/ojn.2016.69072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor Analytical Examination of the Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs Scale: Indications of a Two-Factor Structure

Abstract: Background: Promotion of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) in nursing appears to be developing slowly. Research indicates that nurses' beliefs in EBP may play an even more significant role than knowledge and resources in making implementation feasible. To address this issue, measurement of nurses' beliefs regarding EBP is paramount. Aims and objectives: This study explores the internal consistency reliability and the construct factor structure of the Norwegian version of the original EvidenceBased Practice Beliefs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors perform an EFA multiplication analysis to derive factor score variables to represent the independent variables of the model such as Human Resource Quality, Legal Policies, Socio-Economic Conditions (Field, 2009) [11] and the result will be a continuous variable. Next, the author uses the factor point variable obtained to perform logistic regression.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors perform an EFA multiplication analysis to derive factor score variables to represent the independent variables of the model such as Human Resource Quality, Legal Policies, Socio-Economic Conditions (Field, 2009) [11] and the result will be a continuous variable. Next, the author uses the factor point variable obtained to perform logistic regression.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study population consisted of 197 neurotypical children and 31 children with ASD aged between 7–12 years. The KMO sample adequacy index was well above the recommended value and the sample size was sufficient for a reliable factor analysis ( 26 ). We believe that the size and age of our clinical population was comparable with that of other studies validating social cognition assessment instruments in general and clinical populations ( 9 , 10 , 27 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%