2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-8352(01)00028-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor selection guidelines for job evaluation: A computerized statistical procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship levels of the factors with each other were obtained by the correlation matrix. Das and Garcia-Diaz (2001) develop a computerized statistical method based on the central distribution and correlation measures in order to obtain the factor weights [15]. The factors which have low effects or measure the same function can be determined and removed from the system by applying four statistical tests proposed in this study.…”
Section: Job Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The relationship levels of the factors with each other were obtained by the correlation matrix. Das and Garcia-Diaz (2001) develop a computerized statistical method based on the central distribution and correlation measures in order to obtain the factor weights [15]. The factors which have low effects or measure the same function can be determined and removed from the system by applying four statistical tests proposed in this study.…”
Section: Job Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Job evaluation which has a purpose of eliminating the pay inequalities [19] is performed for determination of the relative worth of jobs to sustain equity in a compensation system [15]. Spyridakos et al (2001) classify the main characteristics of the job evaluation system as providing a rational framework for planning and establishing a fair waging structure, allowing job relation management within the organization and helping the definition of the waging analogies that are correlated to the corresponding work (equal payment for equal work) [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The point job evaluation method, where jobs rate on a set of factors, is the most popular and perhaps most easily understandable of the methods. It is widely used in industry because of its reliability in producing accurate results (Das & Garcia-Diaz 2001). The point method is based on four areas (main factors): skill, responsibility, effort and working conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are more appropriate when the decision-maker has no clear preference over the different factors. Pittel (1999) and Das and Garcia-Diaz (2001) intended to determine the factor weights by using the results of regression analysis with market pay level. Recently, studies have examined the validity and effect of the job evaluation system used on wages (see, for example, Collins & Muchinsky 1993, Chen et al 1999, Rutt & Doverspike 1999, Olson et al 2000, Welbourne & Trevor 2000, Arnault et al 2001, Morgeson et al 2001, Rotundo & Sackett 2004.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%