2021
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.23286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor structure and clinical correlates of the original and 16‐item version of the Difficulties In Emotion Regulation Scale in adolescent girls with eating disorders

Abstract: Objectives: The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) is increasingly used in adolescents. This study is the first to examine the factor structure, measurement, and structural invariance across age, reliability, and validity of the original 36-item and 16-item version of the DERS in adolescents with eating disorders.Methods: Several models were examined using confirmatory factor analysis. Measurement and structural invariance were studied across age groups, and Omega, Omega Hierarchical, and criterio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 71 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DERS is optional in Stepwise assessments; 158 participants had both initial and follow‐up DERS. It has good overall psychometric properties (Gratz & Roemer, 2004), as has the Swedish version (Monell et al, 2021; Nordgren et al, 2020). Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha; α) was good‐excellent for initial (αs = .803–.905; mean α = .867) and good‐excellent for follow‐up subscales forming the Total score (αs = .887–.924; mean α = .906).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DERS is optional in Stepwise assessments; 158 participants had both initial and follow‐up DERS. It has good overall psychometric properties (Gratz & Roemer, 2004), as has the Swedish version (Monell et al, 2021; Nordgren et al, 2020). Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha; α) was good‐excellent for initial (αs = .803–.905; mean α = .867) and good‐excellent for follow‐up subscales forming the Total score (αs = .887–.924; mean α = .906).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%