2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00074-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor structure and stability of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index in a longitudinal study of anxiety disorder patients

Abstract: The past decade witnessed considerable debate over the factor structure of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI), with an eventual consensus emerging that supported a hierarchically organized factor structure. The present study attempted to replicate and examine the overall stability and utility of the hierarchical ASI factor pattern using a large sample of outpatients participating in an ongoing longitudinal study of anxiety disorders. Results supported a hierarchical factor structure for the ASI consisting of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
134
0
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
13
134
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Estos datos son coherentes con algunos estudios previos sobre la estructura de la SA (Taylor, 1995a(Taylor, , 1995bCox et al, 1996;véase Zinbarg eí al., 1999), y en particular con los resultados más recientes de Zinbarg et al (1997), Stewart et al (1997), Mohlman y Zinbarg (2000) y Rodríguez et al (2004).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estos datos son coherentes con algunos estudios previos sobre la estructura de la SA (Taylor, 1995a(Taylor, , 1995bCox et al, 1996;véase Zinbarg eí al., 1999), y en particular con los resultados más recientes de Zinbarg et al (1997), Stewart et al (1997), Mohlman y Zinbarg (2000) y Rodríguez et al (2004).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Dos estudios con pacientes ansiosos (Zinbarg et al, 1997y Rodríguez et al, 2004 también constataron mediante análisis factorial confirmatorio la validez del modelo jerárquico aquí presentado. En los estudios de Stew^art et al (1997), con estudiantes universitarios, y Mohlman y Zinbarg (2000), con participantes de edad avanzada, también probaron la validez del modelo jerárquico aquí presentado, aunque sin aplicar métodos de análisis estructural (i.e., análisis factorial confirmatorio) (Stewart et ai, únicamente emplearon la transformación de Schmid-Leiman, y Mohlman y Zinbarg utilizaron un procedimiento exploratorio poco común que denominan «representación bifactorial», el cual no está exento de dudas sobre su validez).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…For the operationalisation of anxiety sensitivity we used the total score on the ASI. The ASI has been shown to be a reliable and stable measure of fear of anxiety-related bodily sensations with Cronbach"s α above .88 and test-retest correlations above .70 (Rodriguez, Bruce, Pagano, Spencer, & Keller, 2004). Cronbach"s α of .84 in the current sample was very good.…”
Section: Anxiety Sensitivity (As)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Responses to each item are summed to provide a total score from 0-64. Previous research indicates that the ASI is made up of one higher-order factor (ASI Total Score) and three lower-order factors: Physical, Psychological, and Social Concerns (Zinbarg, Barlow, & Brown, 1997;Stewart, Taylor, & Baker, 1997;Rodriguez, Bruce, Pagano, Spencer, & Keller, 2004). The ASI shows adequate test-retest reliability (r = .75 for two weeks), criterion validity (e.g., individuals with agoraphobia score higher than those with other anxiety disorders and those with no disorder), and is distinct from trait anxiety (Reiss et al, 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%