2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.104982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor structure and symptom classes of ICD-11 complex posttraumatic stress disorder in a South Korean general population sample with adverse childhood experiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with prior research, 7,19,21 a clear doseresponse association was evident between cumulative trauma and membership to all trauma classes, and this effect was strongest for the 'CPTSD class'. Consistent with prior studies where sexual trauma was identified as a predominant risk factor for CPTSD, 19,21,72,73 experiences of sexual trauma at lower and higher frequencies of exposure significantly predicted 'CPTSD class' membership. Notably, sexual trauma was also a risk-factor for 'DSO class's membership, 74 although this effect was applicable only at lower quantities of exposure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Consistent with prior research, 7,19,21 a clear doseresponse association was evident between cumulative trauma and membership to all trauma classes, and this effect was strongest for the 'CPTSD class'. Consistent with prior studies where sexual trauma was identified as a predominant risk factor for CPTSD, 19,21,72,73 experiences of sexual trauma at lower and higher frequencies of exposure significantly predicted 'CPTSD class' membership. Notably, sexual trauma was also a risk-factor for 'DSO class's membership, 74 although this effect was applicable only at lower quantities of exposure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The reliability of the DSO scale was 0.79 for all patients and thus closer to an acceptable level for individual assessment. Previous research has reported varying levels of reliability of the ITQ subscales for clinical and population-based samples; for instance, Choi et al ( 2021 ) reported the reliability of the PTSD and DSO subscales as 0.92 and 0.91, respectively, for the Korean ITQ with a general population sample, while in the Danish context, Vang et al ( 2021 ) reported reliabilities ranging from 0.73 to 0.91 (PTSD) and from 0.77 to 0.86 (DSO) for diverse clinical samples. The lower and varied reliabilities in our study can mainly be attributed to our taking into account the LD between items in each scale, as this is known to result in lowered reliability because LD that is not dealt with in some manner will falsely inflate reliability (Marais, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlated six-factor first-order model was identified as the best fitting model in five community studies (Choi et al, 2021;Ho et al, 2020;Kazlauskas et al, 2020;Mordeno et al, 2019). This model was favoured in an overall sample of young adults from East Asia (Ho et al, 2020), a sample of Chinese young adults of which almost three quarters reported at least one ACE , in a sample of combat exposed soldiers from the Philippines (Mordeno et al, 2019), in a sample of South Korean adults (Choi et al, 2021) and in a sample of children and adolescents using the ITQ-CA (Kazluaskas et al, 2020). Notably, the two-factor second-order model was also a good fit to the data in all of these community studies.…”
Section: Factor Structure Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%