1996
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1996.78.1.99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor Structure of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children with Egyptian Schoolchildren

Abstract: The present study investigated the consistency on which the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) is based. To examine the construct validity of this battery, six subtests of the K-ABC and one test from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised were administered to 172 children (82 boys and 90 girls) in Grades 1, 3, and 5. Using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, the factor structure for the Egyptian sample was obtained for Mental Processing and Achievement subtests and then com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A skeptic of g could postulate that our results are a statistical artifact of the decisions we used to conduct a factor analysis. Some data sets in our study had been subjected to EFA in the past, and the results often differed from ours (Attallah et al, 2014;Bulatao & Reyes-Juan, 1968;Church, Katigbak, & Almario-Velazco, 1985;Conant et al, 1999;Dasen, 1984;Dawson, 1967b;Elwan, 1996;Guthrie, 1963;Humble & Dixon, 2017;Irvine, 1964;Kearney, 1966;Lean & Clements, 1981;McFie, 1961;Miezah, 2015;Orbell, 1981;Rasheed et al, 2017;Ruffieux et al, 2010;Sen, Jensen, Sen, & Arora, 1983;Sukhatunga et al, 2002;van en Briel et al, 2000;Warburton, 1951). In response, we wish to emphasize that we chose procedures a priori that are modern methods accepted among experts in factor analysis (e.g., Fabrigar et al, 1999;Larsen & Warne, 2010;Thompson, 2004;Warne & Larsen, 2014).…”
Section: Methodological Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…A skeptic of g could postulate that our results are a statistical artifact of the decisions we used to conduct a factor analysis. Some data sets in our study had been subjected to EFA in the past, and the results often differed from ours (Attallah et al, 2014;Bulatao & Reyes-Juan, 1968;Church, Katigbak, & Almario-Velazco, 1985;Conant et al, 1999;Dasen, 1984;Dawson, 1967b;Elwan, 1996;Guthrie, 1963;Humble & Dixon, 2017;Irvine, 1964;Kearney, 1966;Lean & Clements, 1981;McFie, 1961;Miezah, 2015;Orbell, 1981;Rasheed et al, 2017;Ruffieux et al, 2010;Sen, Jensen, Sen, & Arora, 1983;Sukhatunga et al, 2002;van en Briel et al, 2000;Warburton, 1951). In response, we wish to emphasize that we chose procedures a priori that are modern methods accepted among experts in factor analysis (e.g., Fabrigar et al, 1999;Larsen & Warne, 2010;Thompson, 2004;Warne & Larsen, 2014).…”
Section: Methodological Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…As noted in the case of other studies (Baganda et al, 2006;Boivan et al, 1996;Conant et al, 2003;Elwan, 1996), the K-ABC is a useful and theory driven assessment tool for cross cultural groups. The findings of the present research demonstrate that employing the K-ABC with a South African population is feasible and useful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The third consideration is the fact that the K-ABC has been used as a comprehensive measure of the mental abilities of children from a wide variety of socialcultural milieu. Of relevance is the fact that the K-ABC has been administered to samples of children in Uganda (Baganda et ai., 2006), Egypt (Elwan, 1996), and to a Central African group with evidence ofrobustness of the factor structure. The current study sought to extend this application further and to apply the K-ABC to a South African sample with a longitudinal application.…”
Section: Instrument and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 98%