“…A skeptic of g could postulate that our results are a statistical artifact of the decisions we used to conduct a factor analysis. Some data sets in our study had been subjected to EFA in the past, and the results often differed from ours (Attallah et al, 2014;Bulatao & Reyes-Juan, 1968;Church, Katigbak, & Almario-Velazco, 1985;Conant et al, 1999;Dasen, 1984;Dawson, 1967b;Elwan, 1996;Guthrie, 1963;Humble & Dixon, 2017;Irvine, 1964;Kearney, 1966;Lean & Clements, 1981;McFie, 1961;Miezah, 2015;Orbell, 1981;Rasheed et al, 2017;Ruffieux et al, 2010;Sen, Jensen, Sen, & Arora, 1983;Sukhatunga et al, 2002;van en Briel et al, 2000;Warburton, 1951). In response, we wish to emphasize that we chose procedures a priori that are modern methods accepted among experts in factor analysis (e.g., Fabrigar et al, 1999;Larsen & Warne, 2010;Thompson, 2004;Warne & Larsen, 2014).…”