2020
DOI: 10.5944/rppc.26017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor structure of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory in a Spanish sample of adult victims of interpersonal violence in childhood

Abstract: Research interest in trauma as a possible cause of growth has increased in recent decades. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) is widely used to measure growth after traumatic events. The present study aimed at validating the Spanish version of the PTGI in a sample of 243 young adults (age range from 18 to 35 years old, M = 21 years, SD = 2.5) who experienced interpersonal victimization during their childhood and/or adolescence. Preliminary analyses showed acceptable reliability for the PTGI subscales (C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
9
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory [PTGI ( 49 , 50 ) ] . The PTGI is a 21-item questionnaire that assesses the perception of personal benefits in survivors of a traumatic event.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory [PTGI ( 49 , 50 ) ] . The PTGI is a 21-item questionnaire that assesses the perception of personal benefits in survivors of a traumatic event.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale produces scores for its five subscales (i.e., new possibilities, relating to others, personal strength, spiritual change, and appreciation of life) as well as a total score. The PTGI has been validated with several populations across a variety of traumatic events ( Morris et al, 2005 ; Tedeschi & Calhoun, 1996 ), and multiple languages ( Jaarsma et al, 2006 ; Lamela et al, 2014 ; Pajón et al, 2020 ). The internal consistency for this scale utilizing all items was excellent (α = .95).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of these validation studies pointed to inconsistencies in the factor structure of the PTGI questionnaire. While some studies have supported the original five-factor structure of the questionnaire (e.g., Ramos et al, 2016 ), other authors have observed the best fit for a three-factor structure (e.g., Rodríguez-Rey et al, 2016 ), a four-factor structure (e.g., Pajón et al, 2020 ), or structures with multiple latent factors in general (e.g., Osei-Bonsu et al, 2012 ). Besides the natural variations caused by language/culture adaptation and sampling, the results may differ due to the use of different statistical procedures to verify the factor structure of the PTGI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%