2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2017.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factores predictivos de pérdida ponderal tras la gastrectomía vertical. Estudio multicéntrico hispano-portugués

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A meta-analysis of Parikh et al , including 198 leaks in 8922 patients, revealed that the risk of leak decreased with a bougie ≥40 Fr, with no difference in percentage excessive weight loss between a bougie <40 Fr and a bougie ≥40 Fr up to 36 months [ 9 ]. This strong evidence supports the use of ≥40 Fr bougies to decrease the leak rates, with controversial effects on weight loss [ 9 - 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A meta-analysis of Parikh et al , including 198 leaks in 8922 patients, revealed that the risk of leak decreased with a bougie ≥40 Fr, with no difference in percentage excessive weight loss between a bougie <40 Fr and a bougie ≥40 Fr up to 36 months [ 9 ]. This strong evidence supports the use of ≥40 Fr bougies to decrease the leak rates, with controversial effects on weight loss [ 9 - 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The distance from the pylorus varies from 2-6 cm and is related to a variable leak rate attributed to the higher intragastric pressure obtained after antral resection. Increasing the size of the resected antrum might be associated with better short- and mid-term weight loss results, but could increase the leak rate [ 11 - 13 ]. Recalling that the bougie is only an inferior resecting limit, the principal rule for avoiding overpressure in the sleeve is the critical orientation of the created sleeve, respecting the incisura and the staple-line orientation, together with a correct choice of bougie [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical treatments aiming to improve these pathologies and their comorbidities have not yielded adequate results in terms of weight loss [ 3 ]. However, bariatric surgery (BS) has proven to be an effective method to lose weight over time, being widely accepted by health professionals [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Moreover, it is regarded as a safe, effective and replicable technique with few side effects which might decrease life quality of patients [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entre las técnicas bariátricas, la gastrectomía vertical es cada vez más empleada por sus buenos resultados [1][2]. Sin embargo, actualmente se están publicando resultados a largo plazo que hacen evidente que la reganancia ponderal tras gastrectomía vertical supone un porcentaje significativo de pacientes (resultados heterogéneos que suponen entre el 40-86% de porcentaje de sobrepeso perdido a los 5 años en diferentes series) [2,3,4,5]. La reganancia ponderal, definida como la ganancia de peso tras cirugía bariátrica, es una complicación que se evidencia en un decremento gradual en el porcentaje de peso perdido observado en estudios longitudinales.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…La reganancia ponderal, definida como la ganancia de peso tras cirugía bariátrica, es una complicación que se evidencia en un decremento gradual en el porcentaje de peso perdido observado en estudios longitudinales. Se asocia con la recurrencia de comorbilidad asociada a la obesidad, así como gastos sanitarios adicionales [3]. Las diferencias en cuanto a los resultados encontrados podrían estar en relación a factores relacionados con la técnica, con el paciente, o a factores todavía desconocidos [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified